Jump to content

Consequences Of Brexit [Part 9] Read First Post Before Posting


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, nightrider said:

Looks like the men of violence are having their say about this deal:

https://news.sky.com/story/belfast-and-larne-port-staff-pulled-over-upsurge-in-sinister-and-menacing-behaviour-12206082

 

slow hand clap for the people that voted for this.

...and we're still in the grace period until March, customs checks aren't being fully enforced yet!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, West 77 said:

A textbook example of democracy in action is when the losing side accepts the result with the result being  implemented and the electorate not being told you got the answer wrong so go back have another go and get the answer correct next time.

I think the trouble was the vote was so close, (48% /52%)

So yes, one side won, but hardly decisive in the general run of things, and that's without factoring in a margin for error.

 

It was a recipe for dissatisfaction and division. Particularly on a subject of such importance, where the two sides are polar opposites. And especially when much of the information we were being fed was dubious to say the least, to the point of lies and untrustworthiness.

Edited by Anna B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Anna B said:

I think the trouble was the vote was so close, (48% /52%)

So yes, one side won, but hardly decisive in the general run of things, and that's without factoring in a margin for error.

 

It was a recipe for dissatisfaction and division. Particularly on a subject of such importance, where the two sides are polar opposites. And especially when much of the information we were being fed was dubious to say the least, to the point of lies and untrustworthiness.

For goodness sake.   

 

We're nearly 5 years on from the EU referendum & people are still going on about the closeness of a vote.  It was a democratic vote & a decision was taken on the basis that vote, whereby the Leave side had 1,269,501 more votes than the Remain side.  Doesn't sound that close when you're not speaking of percentages, does it? 

 

You want a close vote?  The one that introduced the Welsh National Assembly.  50.30% Yes; 49.70% No.  I've never heard of anyone saying that this should be re-run or contested in any way? 

 

We left the EU over 13 months ago.  Let it go, move on. 

Edited by Baron99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Baron99 said:

I've never heard of anyone saying that this should be re-run or contested in any way?

You know, you can check this stuff... right? :rolleyes:

 

There were actually lots and lots of people saying precisely that!

 

A significant proportion of the Conservative party at the time contested it, citing the closeness of the result, and subsequently voted to ignore the referendum result by voting against the legislation that enacted the assembly...

 

...including Theresa May!

 

The Conservative Party manifesto of 2005 called for a further referendum on the assembly, that included the option of abolishing it.

 

 

Edited by Magilla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Magilla said:

You know, you can check this stuff... right? :rolleyes:

 

There were actually lots and lots of people saying precisely that!

 

A significant proportion of the Conservative party at the time contested it, citing the closeness of the result, and subsequently voted to ignore the referendum result by voting against the legislation that enacted the assembly...

 

...including Theresa May!

 

The Conservative Party manifesto of 2005 called for a further referendum on the assembly, that included the option of abolishing it.

 

 

Just goes to show many Tory politicians don't actually have any principles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, nightrider said:

Just goes to show many Tory politicians don't actually have any principles.

You could argue that voting against something you genuinely believe is stupid shows principle, and is precisely what MP's are supposed to do.

 

The problem for May is that she tried to pretend she accepted that result as part of her Brexit Means Brexit speech, claiming the "result was accepted by MP's"... it wasn't! She didn't accept the result and was vocal in saying so at the time.

 

In the end she was forced to change the line to "accepted by Parliament".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corbyn's idea pre 2019 election was to review the situation, and all the information we have now following 4 years of arguing and discussion, and then a new vote, which would hopefully be more decisive, and therefore give more weight to the decision, whichever way it went. 

The difference is I believe Corbyn was on the side of what was in the best interests of the people of the UK, with no hidden agendas, and no partisan interests. In other words I trusted him to do the right thing. Which us more than I can say for any other politician. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anna B said:

Corbyn's idea pre 2019 election was to review the situation, and all the information we have now following 4 years of arguing and discussion, and then a new vote, which would hopefully be more decisive, and therefore give more weight to the decision, whichever way it went. 

The difference is I believe Corbyn was on the side of what was in the best interests of the people of the UK, with no hidden agendas, and no partisan interests. In other words I trusted him to do the right thing. Which us more than I can say for any other politician. 

 

 

With respect, Anna, that sounds like a good excuse to do nothing - a common tactic of all politicians. Have a 'review', and if it doesn't fit your liking, have another... and another....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Anna B said:

I think the trouble was the vote was so close, (48% /52%)

 

Don't forget those are rounded numbers as well, the split is less than 4%.

 

48.11% and 51.89% respectively.

 

  

18 hours ago, tinfoilhat said:

In other news, not a teething problem.

 

BBC News - EU shellfish import ban permanent, UK fishing industry told
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55903599

 

A shellfish decision if you ask me. 

Edited by geared
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.