RollingJ

Yes, they are referring to SC1 - I bet the fact is in a very small font somewhere.

As a point of interest SC2 is only scheduled as every 20 minutes - has been since its introduction.

I am, yes. Appreciated. 👍

I doubt it, as the OP clearly states 'voting papers', and confirms that they have the same identification on both sets.

As both voting forms come in the same envelope (mine did, from SCC's Returning Officer), i would guess they are one and the same.

I don't know - but you need to check with the Returning Officers staff for clarification.

I was not being sarcastic - merely pointing out the possible effects of completing both sets of papers

@Annie Bynnol - see my response above 😉

I suggest you ring them and explain the situation. I am guessing here, but I suspect those codes are scanned, and if duplicated, at least one would be cancelled.

Are these duplicates (same reference numbers) or new ones?

OK - as it seems I'm being followed around on here, I shall stick to commenting on things where I have solid data - clearly 'alternative' views are not welcome by some.

As they haven't even drawn up the plans, I doubt it.

If you want to live in a soul-less concrete jungle, fair enough, but some of us wonder what these architects are doing. Do none of them have any greater skill? What are they paid vast sums for - it's not as though any of them can seemingly design much more than concrete rabbit-hutches, from what I see.

Just as an aside, this proves that Coppard & Co will make a complete foul-up if they take over the PSV service - they haven''t got a clue what they are doing.

I don't think it is a case of 'loose lips sink ships', more that someone has really not thought this trough, As I said, the buses are NOT supposed to be stored there, and some knuckles are going to get rapped - hard.

So, if security were aware of the issue, why were they not more vigilant? And why were they still stored there - As far as I can determine, the Interchange is not listed as as an operation centre.

That bit is, I suspect an 'Ollie' figure plucked out of mid-air for effect, because I bet he, or his 'advisors' don't have a clue either.

Sorry, but some of his (and his predecessors) 'press releases' have been a little, shall we say, 'ambiguous' , so I view them with caution. 😄

Well, he would say that, wouldn't he? 'Massaged' figures?

I have the feeling we'll never know the truth - there will be too many red faces if it comes out.

Which strongly suggests Interchange security is lacking.

Useful comment - not. 😄

I understand what you are saying in your last paragraph, and that is not the same as storing them there - if they need towing, they need towing. Agree with most of your comment, too, although I would take issue slightly with your last comment.

The fact they can start and drive a bus doesn't make them any less of a twonk (thief, if you prefer). It is a long time since I heard of one in Sheffield, but I think it has happened before. The problem in this case is that they were in insecure storage, in a quiet part of city. How often do you see empty buses just sat there, in the open, in the middle of the night? You don't - they are in secured compounds.

There's always some twonks who will try anything 'for a laugh' - and having the vehicles in insecure storage just makes it easier for said sad cases.