Axe Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 5 hours ago, Padders said: Yes it was stupid, it made no impact at all. An expensive pantomime. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 8 minutes ago, cressida said: Roget's playpen? No. This is Rogets playpen 👍 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hauxwell Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 I’m just thankful Iran hasn’t got nuclear weapons, but how advanced they are in producing one is frightening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 5 minutes ago, hauxwell said: I’m just thankful Iran hasn’t got nuclear weapons, but how advanced they are in producing one is frightening. The chances are they do have nukes bought from either Russia or China. Yes they are close to being able to produce their own but like Israel they probably have a few undeclared nuclear weapons. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hauxwell Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 Just now, The_DADDY said: The chances are they do have nukes bought from either Russia or China. Yes they are close to being able to produce their own but like Israel they probably have a few undeclared nuclear weapons. Oh dear that doesn’t sound good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geared Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 Israel has been suspected of having nukes for decades now. It'd be extremely unwise for Iran to have a pop at them with a nuke of their own. 48 minutes ago, The_DADDY said: The chances are they do have nukes bought from either Russia or China. Doubtful they'd be silly enough to actually sell a nuclear weapon. The isotype ratio of the material in the bomb can be matched back to the source reactor, as each has a slightly different ratio it kinda acts like a fingerprint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 12 minutes ago, geared said: Israel has been suspected of having nukes for decades now. It'd be extremely unwise for Iran to have a pop at them with a nuke of their own. Doubtful they'd be silly enough to actually sell a nuclear weapon. The isotype ratio of the material in the bomb can be matched back to the source reactor, as each has a slightly different ratio it kinda acts like a fingerprint. Of course I hope you're right there but in today's crazy word anything is possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altus Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 5 hours ago, peak4 said: Not by me 😉 People don't get called conspiracy theorists for being skeptical of western mainstream media, they get called it for the sources they trust, without any skepticism, instead. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 5 minutes ago, altus said: People don't get called conspiracy theorists for being skeptical of western mainstream media, they get called it for the sources they trust, without any skepticism, instead. That's quite the generalisation. Well done 👍 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mafya Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 4 hours ago, Axe said: An expensive pantomime. I saw on the news that irans weapons cost a couple of million and that the Israelis, US and uk along with France used more then a billion pounds worth of bombs to repel the attack so yes it was costly for the western coalition. Israel can’t expect to go found bombing embassies and not have any retaliation. Irans attack was symbolic as they were forced into responding by Israel’s actions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now