Jump to content
We’re excited to announce the forum is under new management! Click here for details.


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About altus

  • Rank
    Registered User

Personal Information

  • Location
    Nether Edge

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. You're sounding like a conspiracy theorist there. Nobody can go to the mods and say 'can you ban this person'. If some posters are capable of moderating their posts to fit within the forum rules[1] and others aren't capable of doing that then the latter have only themselves to blame for the results. [1] Or at least close enough to them to only warrant a forum holiday.
  2. Israel isn't a representative example as it's going to have problems regardless of the electoral system - problems come from trying to combine a largely secular outlook with a lot of people with extreme religious views. Add in their issues with their borders with their neighbours, etc. and it's always going to be 'complicated'. PR works well in Germany and NZ for example. I thought everyone assumed that when he took the Manchester Mayor post. Step back from the Corbynista/Blairite squabbles and return as the unity candidate at some point in the future when it's all blown over. It doesn't look like he'll be trying to return any time soon.
  3. Perhaps you can explain why you think that indicates that the UK's representatives in the EU were against the new rules.
  4. Conspicuous by it's absence in that report is the part UK politicians played in enabling legislation for the changes in standards. If UK politicians had voted against it you'd think an anti-EU site would be crowing about the EU imposing changes on the UK against our wishes. The fact that they don't implies that this is yet again another example of Brexiters blaming the EU for something that the UK supported.
  5. Did you actually read the original post? This wasn't two colleagues sharing a bit of banter, it was a superior telling off a subordinate. If it had just been a bit of banter the subordinate should have been able to respond in kind. How do you think doing so would have gone down if the subordinate in the OP had done so in this instance?
  6. It's useful for the government because it allows them to say they are doing something to help those who've lost their jobs because of Covid. Whether it is of any practical use in helping the newly unemployment in finding work is irrelevant.
  7. Corbyn's position on how he wanted Brexit to turn out, renegotiate the Tory deal to be closer to the EU, was consistent with the referendum result. Don't forget, the referendum did not define what Brexit would look like and the Leave campaigns were assiduous about not defining it so people would project what they wanted onto it and be more likely to vote for it. A Norway style deal would have honoured the result of the referendum. There never was one true Brexit that everyone who voted leave supported, only that we no longer be members of the EU. Ultimately it was blocked by people wanting a different sort of Brexit from that negotiated - i.e. the ERG blocking May's deal.
  8. And in news that will surprise nobody with more than a handful of brain cells to rub together: Brexit travel permits designed to avoid 7,000-lorry jams come January depends on software that won't be finished till April.
  9. NHS England is even planning covid-free hospitals during a second wave. Some hospitals in England to be kept Covid-free in second wave
  10. As well as a border down the Irish Sea, it looks like we'll be getting one in Kent - Lorry drivers will face de-facto Brexit border in Kent, Gove confirms. This is only necessary because of the government's failure to prepare for us actually leaving the EU.
  11. I'm not going to sink the point, as I was the one who made it, but I will put it in a bit of context. I was only responding to the 'air resistance is negligible' argument. If you factor in the reduced travel time of 70 vs 60, the difference in total emissions would be about 17%.
  12. And what happens when Boris tries to get a trade deal with the US? It's worth noting that the provisional one we've negotiated with Japan gives them 80% of the benefits - it's easy to get a trade deal when it's so one sided. The US is likely to drive an even harder bargain - especially if Donald "America First" Trump is still in charge.
  13. At both those speeds almost all the effort is in overcoming air resistance, which is proportional to velocity squared. So travelling at 70 requires about 36% more effort than travelling at 60 does. It would be a very strange engine that could produce 36% more power output for a marginal increase in fuel consumption.
  14. In the latest episode of "Republicans Don't Listen to the Lyrics", Trump plays Fortunate Son at a rally. No prizes for guessing whether they'd got approval for playing the song.
  15. The government's hands will be tied over NI if we don't get a deal with the EU and fall back on WTO terms. The WTO rules state that you have to treat everyone you trade with on WTO terms equally. That means if the UK choses not to perform border checks on goods coming from the EU to the UK (via RoI to NI), they can't perform them on goods coming to the UK from anyone else we trade with under WTO terms. Now the WTO doesn't actively enforce it's rules, it waits for one of it's member countries to complain it's being treated unfairly - but without a deal that will include most countries after the end of this year and the chances of no countries complaining are vanishingly small. So what would you prefer, a border between NI and RoI with a return to the troubles or no borders with anyone?
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.