Baron99   847 #3733 Posted January 22, 2021 400 found attending a wedding celebration in London. The fact many fleed as officers arrived, shows they knew they were in the wrong.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-55764673 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
RiffRaff   10 #3734 Posted January 22, 2021 45 minutes ago, Baron99 said: 400 found attending a wedding celebration in London. The fact many fleed as officers arrived, shows they knew they were in the wrong.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-55764673 Fleed? Tsk, tsk, Baron! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Baron99 Â Â 847 #3735 Posted January 22, 2021 5 minutes ago, RiffRaff said: Fleed? Tsk, tsk, Baron! Sausage flingers! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Thirsty Relic   218 #3736 Posted January 22, 2021 58 minutes ago, Baron99 said: 400 found attending a wedding celebration in London. The fact many fleed as officers arrived, shows they knew they were in the wrong.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-55764673 I saw this on the mid-day noos (fat fingas spreading!) as well. 400 attending, police produced a strategy and stopped it, yet only fined 5 people. It is reported there was a large police presence, so how come only 5 were fined? They didn't all run home when they saw the police - most presumably came by car. All they'd got to do is get all the car plates close by scanned (they can do this easily), then have a number of police waiting as they rush to their cars. As they got in, tell them to expect their £200 fines. Even if they only got 100 of them that way, 100 x £200 = £20,000. That would surely pay for the operation and something left over. Instead, taxpayers get to pay for the event! In addition, if many of them were not local, what were they doing out of their area in a lockdown without sufficient allowed reason? Another potential fine missed!  As it is, this goes to publicise that there is only a 5/400 chance of getting fined for attending an illegal event such as this. Wrong signal! Opportunity missed! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
petemcewan   27 #3737 Posted January 22, 2021 (edited) This link succinctly sums up the difference between:Vatiant, Strain and Mutation. It's worth knowing the difference.  "Arrrg! It's a new strain" , Is bandied around willy nilly all over the News. Take no notice of the comment ,"Janneke 222"  ,at the bottom of the article. A virus is not alive. It does not fight for its existence.  https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/covid-strain-mutation-variant-england-b1777724.html Edited January 22, 2021 by petemcewan Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
apelike   10 #3738 Posted January 22, 2021 5 minutes ago, petemcewan said: This link succinctly sums up the difference between:Vatiant, Strain and Mutation. It's worth knowing the difference.  "Arrrg! It's a new strain" , Is bandied around willy nilly all over the News.  https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/covid-strain-mutation-variant-england-b1777724.html Unfortunately the latest news by the Government and its advisors seem to think it is now more deadly by up to 30% , which does not mean much, as well as it spreading more easily and faster.  The problem now being is that even those in the know advising the government also state the data is still in the preliminary stage and that the evidence on lethality is not strong yet. Maybe they should stop the scare stories until they have concrete data to back it up as many will now question it.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55768627   Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
tinfoilhat   11 #3739 Posted January 22, 2021 1 minute ago, apelike said: Unfortunately the latest news by the Government and its advisors seem to think it is now more deadly by up to 30% , which does not mean much, as well as it spreading more easily and faster.  The problem now being is that even those in the know advising the government also state the data is still in the preliminary stage and that the evidence on lethality is not strong yet. Maybe they should stop the scare stories until they have concrete data to back it up as many will now question it.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55768627   1300 plus a day for the past few days isn't enough? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mister M   1,662 #3740 Posted January 22, 2021 2 hours ago, Baron99 said: 400 found attending a wedding celebration in London. The fact many fleed as officers arrived, shows they knew they were in the wrong.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-55764673 I hope the proverbial book is thrown at the organisers of this wedding, and all those who attended. How utterly selfish and entitled these people are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
RiffRaff   10 #3741 Posted January 22, 2021 1 hour ago, Baron99 said: Sausage flingers! I thought you were working on another Uxbridge dictionary job! 3 minutes ago, Mister M said: I hope the proverbial book is thrown at the organisers of this wedding, and all those who attended. How utterly selfish and entitled these people are. Indeed so. (That would be the Torah, then!) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Becky B   31 #3742 Posted January 22, 2021 8 hours ago, nikki-red said: If your oxygen levels are dangerously low you need help Covid or not. The problem being, post covid you can be hypoxic on exertion without any symptoms, even shortness of breath. STH were giving out pulse oximeters to post covid patients last year! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mister M   1,662 #3743 Posted January 22, 2021 It's interesting that the school say they 'leased' the hall out. Surely they have some responsibility to find out what it is being leased out for??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mister M   1,662 #3744 Posted January 22, 2021 1 hour ago, Thirsty Relic said: I saw this on the mid-day noos (fat fingas spreading!) as well. 400 attending, police produced a strategy and stopped it, yet only fined 5 people. It is reported there was a large police presence, so how come only 5 were fined? They didn't all run home when they saw the police - most presumably came by car. All they'd got to do is get all the car plates close by scanned (they can do this easily), then have a number of police waiting as they rush to their cars. As they got in, tell them to expect their £200 fines. Even if they only got 100 of them that way, 100 x £200 = £20,000. That would surely pay for the operation and something left over. Instead, taxpayers get to pay for the event! In addition, if many of them were not local, what were they doing out of their area in a lockdown without sufficient allowed reason? Another potential fine missed!  As it is, this goes to publicise that there is only a 5/400 chance of getting fined for attending an illegal event such as this. Wrong signal! Opportunity missed! Apparently the Yesodey Hatorah School in Hackney is also used as a Coronavirus testing site. Coronavirus information and support | Hackney Council Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...