hard2miss Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Works for me, it should open a PDF document in your browser. If not try this link and scroll down.  Still not working Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hard2miss Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Unless its Ian Huntley I wouldnt lose no sleep over it. I haven't. It was my own fault anyhow for not putting my trainers on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emmie92 Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Still not working  http://www.sirimo.co.uk/2009/05/14/uk-photographers-rights-v2/comment-page-18/#comment-4067 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hard2miss Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Pedos can glue cameras to the bellies of sparrows. That's a true truth. The African or European Sparrow ?     Or is that coconuts ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinfoilhat Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 The police can be very two faced when it comes to cameras. Someone from sky et al under their direction can film no matter what. As soon as the guy they arrest says "get the camera out of my face " ( rightly in my view) they'll quote "it's a public place they can film what they like". Â I suspect a different story if someone with a camera followed his wife round town on a Saturday afternoon. Â I think you should be asked, even after the event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hard2miss Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Are you being serious? That's utterly bizarre behaviour on your part. Â Your entitled to your opinion. Â Bizarre is looking out of your window to see some wierdo with a telephoto lens pointed at you. I don't see my actions as being bizarre at all, his actions were the direct cause of mine, anyone not wanting to be chased down the street simply does not have to go pointing their camera where they have not been given permission to. Had he been polite and asked I would have let him, that's the point, he was arrogant enough to think it did not matter and could get away with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 anyone not wanting to be chased down the street simply does not have to go pointing their camera where they have not been given permission to. He doesn't need permission. It isn't illegal to take photos of buildings*. Â * Except in unique circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hard2miss Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 I think you are spot on Halibut. I have two children aged 2 and 6, if I saw somebody photographing my children whilst out in public, I would simply assume they like taking photographs and my children just made good subjects. I may ask why they were taking them and what they would do with them, but that would be out of interest and curiosity. Children make for some great photographs especially when they are unaware and not posing, when they are at play laughing and smiling, I would't object to somebody wanting to capture that, even a stranger.Maybe the Photographers should get life's and have kids if they are interested in children ? I know my kids are funny and have pictures of them, but that's because they are mine and in my care to do that. Just as I have the right to not have them modelling or whatever, I should have the right to tell someone that I do not wish their picture taken.  If they were in a public place and were not the focal point of the picture, and just part of the make up of the general public around them, then I would be happy to let it go, but I would want assurances that that was the case if I saw someone pointing their camera at them. This is not like someone who is in the media anyway or wanting some sort of publicity, you should be allowed the right to privacy in you private life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hard2miss Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 He doesn't need permission. It isn't illegal to take photos of buildings*. * Except in unique circumstances.  Your missing the point. If he is taking the picture of mine then yes he does. He needs mine, I don't care what the laws handle is of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_Sleeps Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Your missing the point. If he is taking the picture of mine then yes he does. No he doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now