hard2miss

Well theres a lot of wierd people in the world then. It wasn't that long ago that being homosexual was wierd, how times have changed eh, maybe theres hope for us yet ? Marrage now is not the same thing and you don't have to be wierd to work that one out. I never gave homosexuality a second thought until they demanded they desolve marrage to prove a point, churches should advertise that what they offer is real marrage and maintain the ban on these fake hijacked marrages that are now offered.

Yes it was... whats that word where you draw up an exagerated example of soething in order to express something ? It elludes me, but it was that. ---------- Post added 03-09-2013 at 01:02 ---------- Depends on how serious and what you thought marrage to be I suppose, to me it feels watered down. I took great pride in the institute of marrage but whats a marrage mean anymore ?

Your mum was not on sort of witnes protection program was she ?

Its obvious what was meant, keep flicking the mud you may hit someone. ---------- Post added 03-09-2013 at 00:50 ---------- None, but offended me deeply.

Your question does not appear to have any meaning to me, could you please elaberate the point ?

In the way Jimmy Saville just wanted to be round minors ? Wanting something and having it given is two different things. Marrage by definition is between a man and woman and has been since time began, I doubt very much 'they wanted to join in', they could not. But that never stopped them 'spit the dummy out' (see my innitial post in the topic) to get their way did it ?

Yes it does. To those who took marrage for the institution it was to what it has become because of gay intolllerance. The very meaning and essence of marrage has now been changed because of the gay lobby and its intollerance of something they could not by definition be party to . Why was the unions of people not enough if in law they amounted to the same thing ? They wanted to strip away the word marrage and its meaning for nothing more than the intollerance of the rest of us and our way of life. Its the same thing to me.

I stand corrected (if you felt the need) Marrage by its deffinition excluded homosexuals, they did not have to try join in, they had its equiverlant in law.

Why don't gay people watch match of the day ?

Much the same way that the constitution that was once marrage has now been diluted and changed to mean something different because homosexuals were intollerent of something they could not by defenition be involved in.

Agreed. It happens, now move on. Theres no reason for promotion of it in schools. And the media should also show sociaty how it is and not over percentigise homosexuality.

What makes you think Im homophobic ? Do you find it hard to accept that I can have an issue with gay promotion and not actually have a problem with gays ? How strange you wish me to accept something while not allowing me the same respect. Your post did make me think you had a personal interest with the level you were going to to dismiss my opinion and lable me homophobic inorder to discredit me.

I have know addicts that have been able to hold down jobs, the problems arrise when you have an addiction with no means to support it.

Anyone who does not think theres an issue in the area should walk a day in the shoes of those complaining. I live close by and they are a problem.

My mistake, I must have read into what you were saying incorrectly. You must be able to understand how easy that can be done ?

So your offence is a personal one Halibut ? I have no problem of your lifestyle halibut, if you took my post personal, but I do feel they over repressent it too much. When you discovered you were gay you probably did not need a lesson in sex education to work it out, you are what you are, are you not ? So why do you feel that other after you need to have the curriculum amending to work it out, and have over repressention of it in the media ? If its ok to be gay then their should be no need to keep trying to show its ok via the level of media coverage it gets.

Halibut has been pumping for someone to show some sort of homophobia in their view, Im sure now he will have enough for them to erase the topic I would be happy for them to leave the over promotion of it and maybe class the gay lobby as a terrorist organisation. (the last part was a joke)

You don't get it do you ? I don't care what you think nore am I going to acquiesce to your interigation.

I can guarentee you I did not, It said I edited because I put up another post or something directly after, besides look at the edit time. Your not pinning your eye sight problems on me pal.

Same respect, not more than. I'm sure that their are loads of groups of peoples that would like the same amount of air time and publicity that homosexuals get, but thay would need to have the same agressive lobby that gays do.

Exactly my point, Im glad its not lost. The media over portrays the homosexual lifestyle, Im sure as waters wet of that. Just look at the percentages and then watch tv, anyone can see that sociaty is not made up to such a high degree gays as they would have you believe.

Are you really only this bright ? Is big brother not a program on tv and do I not say directly after holly oaks big brother ? Now stop trying to make the topic a personal argument (another great tactic to getting something locked/removed) and accept that I am not interested how I am portraying myself to you. I have already said your not that inportant to me to care what you think

I give two examples, your reading skills are either lacking or you choose not see what is before you. I understand you may not like how the topic is going but I suggest you drop you bone because you are not using me as a tool to get it removed. Use your moderation button and cry 'Homophobia', Im sure the powers that be will have the offending topic removed for you without me ---------- Post added 02-09-2013 at 22:56 ---------- The forum is open for anyone to see your posting history, Im sure I am not the first to let your cat out of its bag. Your still incinuating Im homophobic Nice going

I don't know about work houses but I would be for some sort of national service of some kind for those not in further education at least. It would help control unemployment levels and help instill discipline and give leavers a good work ethic.

Maybe so, I jsust think it looks too big, from what I can make out from the pigeon anyhow.