Simon T Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 Having just watched the truly awful 'love in the time of cholera' I wondered whether a film can ever top the original book. I guess some books are more suited to adapting than others Off the top of my head, wasn't the godfather originally a novel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Wallace* Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 It was yes,i think The Green Mile was a pretty good adaptation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeP Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 I preferred the film 'Field of Dreams' to the book it was based ion 'Shoeless Joe'. Some books are just difficult to adapt and shouldn't be attempted. Something like 'The Godfather' and other big 'blockbuster' type novels have their own issues with adaptation - primarily editing - but because it's usually a linear narrative structure you can usually make a decent job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEKRO138 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 Any crap book is better as a film, simply because it takes up less time to find out that the story is ********. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evildrneil Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 I must admit I preferred the film of fight club to the book - heathen that I am! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Moomin Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 don't know about a film, but I always preferred the televised Morse to the books, could never get away with Colin Dexter's writing style Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessica23 Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 I must admit I preferred the film of fight club to the book - heathen that I am! I don't know if I preferred it, but this was one film that I was going to say is pretty damn good adaptation. Another good one is American Psycho. The book is genuinely too much for some people - the graphic violence just ruins it - but I thought the film conveyed the madness without the gore really well. Female director, too Other good ones - Gone with the Wind, Brokeback Mountain... I don't think the film ever improves the book, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annoni_mouse Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 I know many will disagree, but I think the Shawshank Redemption was a far better film than a short story (and I'm saying that as a big SK fan) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoba Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 I must admit I preferred the film of fight club to the book - heathen that I am! Not a heathen- you, Sir, are absolutely correct. Brilliant book though it is, the film is so much better. It's just all of the little visual touches that make it for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdnaKrabappe Posted March 28, 2008 Share Posted March 28, 2008 Although i like Phillip K Dick, I love the remakes usually of his short stories. Blade Runner obviously , Total Recall, Minority Report although the Paycheck with Ben Affleck was a bit bobbins. I prefer Trainspotting the film to Trainspotting the book and I thought they did a good job on About a boy and Fever Pitch but i still prefer the written version of High Fidelity. Can't believe noone has taken the option to make Tony Parsons books- they'd make brilliant films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now