Stoatwobbler Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 (edited) Labour need to be more pragmatic and less idealistic. The most important thing is getting into power. There are too many people in Labour who prefer being out of power and criticising the government to being in power and having to make compromises. But by the same token, Labour's pitch to the electorate needs to be more positive. Not just shrieking "VOTE FOR US OR IT'S THE TORIES" endlessly while acting like a much weaker version of said Conservatives. I really do worry that the moderate wing of the Labour party hasn't grasped this point. Edited July 22, 2015 by Stoatwobbler . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Shaw Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 Labour need to be more pragmatic and less idealistic. The most important thing is getting into power. There are too many people in Labour who prefer being out of power and criticising the government to being in power and having to make compromises. Corbyn, for one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrNorm Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Labour too idealistic? Yes, I'd agree. Politics demands compromise. You're forever going to be sidelined if you don't face realities. "The speed and rapidity with which we are beginning to be regarded as irrelevant and out of the debate is really terrifying.” Tristram Hunt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommo68 Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 I don't care which way they move. More right wing like they have been doing to become pseudo conservatives More left wing to reject new labour and return to traditional labour values, working with the unions to safeguard british jobs for british workers. Either way does not matter as long it helps them remain in a position where they can do no more harm. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Arthur Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 You're wrong - Even the permanent secretary to the Treasury, Sir Nicholas Macpherson, recently rubbished the idea, and admitted the economic disaster was “a banking crisis pure and simple”. That's like Nigel Clough blaming Stuart Gray for Sheffield United's poor form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 That's like Nigel Clough blaming Stuart Gray for Sheffield United's poor form. Here is the article where it is referenced. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/may/03/senior-tory-financial-crash-was-purely-a-banking-crisis-not-labour-overspend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drummonds Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 That's like Nigel Clough blaming Stuart Gray for Sheffield United's poor form. it's a line the labour party tried to sell right through the election campaign, but it fooled no one. http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2015/04/the-truth-about-labour-and-overspending/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anna B Posted July 27, 2015 Author Share Posted July 27, 2015 I don't see why trying to promote more fairness, and helping those who need it is seen as 'left wing.' Nor does it preclude doing business with the great and the good to promote the best interests of this country. What's the problem? Is it just this country (and maybe America,) who like to divide politics into two opposing forces without acknowledging any shades of grey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrNorm Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 Is it just this country (and maybe America,) who like to divide politics into two opposing forces without acknowledging any shades of grey? It's the "first past the post" voting system: "It is a common, but not universal, feature of electoral systems with single-member legislative districts, and generally results over time in a two-party competition" Wikipedia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommo68 Posted July 28, 2015 Share Posted July 28, 2015 So desperate have they allegedly become that it would appear that membership of the labour party is available at a give away price and you could pay as little as £1 a year. Their standard rate starts at £3.88 When signing up as a registered supporter – rather than joining as a party member – people must agree to the declaration: “I support the aims and values of the Labour Party, and I am not a supporter of any organisation opposed to it.” With membership charges so low it is very tempting to join just to try and be sure they elect a new leader that will be most unlikely to be able to lead the party to win a general election. As for the statement “I support the aims and values of the Labour Party," I do... I really do as long as they continue to help ensure no general election win in the forseeable future. Seems like a few quid well spent if I can help to keep them out of office. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now