Jeffrey Shaw Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 http://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-stuart-hall The sentencing comments by the Judge at Preston. Full details of the appeal are not yet available. And the evidence never will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redfox Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 I suspect you may find rather a lot of detail in the judgement following the Att-Gen reference - but there hardly going to put every part of the evidence on the net are they ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 He's now been charged with 16 more offences I believe that children are our future. Unless we stop them now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 not sure about condoning but you seem very blase on what after all IS sexual attacks rickiethecat did say he was in the minority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melthebell Posted October 23, 2013 Author Share Posted October 23, 2013 rickiethecat did say he was in the minority. funnily enough thats a name i havent seen around for a while, funny how all these posters seem to morth into one Oo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronthenekred Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 funnily enough thats a name i havent seen around for a while, funny how all these posters seem to morth into one Oo They all live under the same bedsit roof..it must smell a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Total Chaos Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 It should not have been allowed.He should have just served the sentance he was originally given and then the judge that gave him the lenient sentance in the 1st place,should have been fired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheffandy Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 It should not have been allowed.He should have just served the sentance he was originally given and then the judge that gave him the lenient sentance in the 1st place,should have been fired. Bet you wouldn't have said that if it was your 11 year old he had raped. Hope this seedy old ******* gets whats coming to him every single day in prison from other inmates. Suffer you ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamrocker Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 Theyve arrested him in prison maybe due to public pressure,I doubt if it matters much he would probably have been gate arrested anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owethemnowt Posted October 23, 2013 Share Posted October 23, 2013 but ...... but ...... but ............. establishment figure, lots of friends, influence and fingers to be pointed, so he gets an inadequate sentence first time around as the tentacles reach into the judiciary and provide leniency. Then we have another go to get justice and the influence backs away. Justice. Yeah. Sort of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now