WeX Â Â 10 #49 Posted April 26, 2013 Yes o lord of the thread. On the other hand you could take some of your own advice, that way it would die a death just like wot da fred iz abaht. Â I'm sorry but don't speak jive. Â ---------- Post added 26-04-2013 at 13:01 ---------- Â Um, the thread was started by one of you lot. Â What do you mean "you lot"? What "lot" am I? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Lockjaw   11 #50 Posted April 26, 2013   What do you mean "you lot"? What "lot" am I?  Well, since you ask, there are a number of sub-sections of the human race which, having read your posts on here and, on occasion, engaged with you, that I'd put you in but, given that we are required to attack the post and not the poster, I'm afraid I'll have to defer at this point in time.  Soz. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ronthenekred   10 #51 Posted April 26, 2013 Well, since you ask, there are a number of sub-sections of the human race which, having read your posts on here and, on occasion, engaged with you, that I'd put you in but, given that we are required to attack the post and not the poster, I'm afraid I'll have to defer at this point in time. Soz.  He don't do jive bro.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
WeX   10 #52 Posted April 26, 2013 Well, since you ask, there are a number of sub-sections of the human race which, having read your posts on here and, on occasion, engaged with you, that I'd put you in but, given that we are required to attack the post and not the poster, I'm afraid I'll have to defer at this point in time. Soz.  So you resort to veiled insults .. that's about your level I suppose. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Obelix   11 #53 Posted April 26, 2013 Well, since you ask, there are a number of sub-sections of the human race which, having read your posts on here and, on occasion, engaged with you, that I'd put you in but, given that we are required to attack the post and not the poster, I'm afraid I'll have to defer at this point in time. Soz.  Since I started this thread I'd have to assume you would place me in there as well yes? I ask merely for clarification. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
mikem8634 Â Â 10 #54 Posted April 26, 2013 So you resort to veiled insults .. that's about your level I suppose. Â Since I started this thread I'd have to assume you would place me in there as well yes? I ask merely for clarification. Â It might be a subset you'd be happy to be in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Lockjaw   11 #55 Posted April 26, 2013 Since I started this thread I'd have to assume you would place me in there as well yes? I ask merely for clarification.  Hiya Obelix. I'd put you in a number of subsets, most of which do not contain Wex and two of which I am most definitely in myself.  The subset you occupy with Wex, though, I am not in. That is the subset of humans who take issue with those who take issue with the public cost of Thatcher's funeral.  Does that clarify sufficiently?  ---------- Post added 26-04-2013 at 16:07 ----------  So you resort to veiled insults .. that's about your level I suppose.  I was merely answering your question, Wex. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Harleyman   12 #56 Posted April 26, 2013 You aint see nuthin yet. Wait until the Queen dies and then see the bill for the funeral Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Obelix   11 #57 Posted April 26, 2013 The subset you occupy with Wex, though, I am not in. That is the subset of humans who take issue with those who take issue with the public cost of Thatcher's funeral.  Apart from the fact that's not an accurate description. I don't have any issue with people objecting to the cost, as long as they do so rationally and are not just spouting off. Sadly that doesnt fit many of the people on here, who just slaver at the mouth Pavlovian style at the mere mention of her name. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
rossyrooney   12 #58 Posted April 26, 2013 He don't do jive bro..   :hihi::hihi::hihi: That tickled my chuckle muscle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ronthenekred   10 #59 Posted April 26, 2013 Apart from the fact that's not an accurate description. I don't have any issue with people objecting to the cost, as long as they do so rationally and are not just spouting off. Sadly that doesnt fit many of the people on here, who just slaver at the mouth Pavlovian style at the mere mention of her name.    £3.6 million in total. Now would all those wildey throwing around £10 million, £15 million, etc like to retract their crazy figures?  No, didn't think you would.   C'mon, you couldn't wait.. you went for the gloat, be genuine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Lockjaw   11 #60 Posted April 26, 2013 Apart from the fact that's not an accurate description. I don't have any issue with people objecting to the cost, as long as they do so rationally and are not just spouting off. Sadly that doesnt fit many of the people on here, who just slaver at the mouth Pavlovian style at the mere mention of her name.  Of course there are but those who didn't worship her do an adequate job of countering most of the nonsense those people spout. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...