Found A Petition To Change This Situation

[Grumpycatweasel]

4 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said:

Why is it a catastrophe?

 

Retirement age has barely moved since the 1960s years yet life expectancy has increased by 10 to 15 years.  Perfectly sensible for future projection discussions to be taking place about increases to retirement age and even more sensible when many of the next generation of pensioners will be starting their working life significantly than their predecessors.

 

Yes.  Applying the scenario you are proposing, I certainly do call  "the public" dumb.  "The public" are emotive, reactionary, narrow minded, fickle, manipulated, without facts, without knowledge and without context. 

 

We see it all the time now and you are seriously suggesting they have weekly input at the click of an online vote over high level strategic decisions affecting potentially billions of pounds of assets, investment, global relationships, economics, stability, corporate and civil service operations, essential infrastructure, compliance with legislation or global commitments.  

I have a different opinion regarding life expectancy I’ve just witnessed more than the usual amount of people decease, covid causing alot of those? 
 

I’m suggesting the use of an electronic voting system in use for political situations is 100% the future we all need & want 

 

I would also never call anyone any of the derogatory terms you stated, people are miss-informed and react accordingly

 

the ancient practices the political system uses at present causes this lack of facts , knowledge and moral clarity 

 

 

 

 

[Resident]

3 hours ago, Grumpycatweasel said:

(1) How can electronic voting be horrendously insecure when ATMs monetary systems etc are the most secure electronics to be invented  todate
 

(2) Surely small flaps of paper in some disused post office sorted by a middle aged woman with failing eye sight is quite frankly barbaric compared to state of the art electronics 

 

(3)Not sure if the group in power at the moment were actually elected? 
 

(4)All i know is massive government spending and we have no say in it whatsoever? How can that be morally acceptable 

(1) Google is your friend. There are NUMEROUS videos on the subject all describing how it's a REALLY bad idea

(2) When was the last time you voted? Never in my life-time has public voting been held in a post-office. 

(3) The Conservative Party are the current party in control of the Government. They have been in power since 6th May 2010, after winning the 54th General Election. The have subsequently won the 55th-57th General Elections.

(4) You have a say. Every General Election each party produces a manifesto, Spending is part of that manifesto. You get the opportunity to vote for the party who's manifesto best aligns with your views.

 

[RollingJ]

2 minutes ago, Grumpycatweasel said:

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/655372

14 votes.

[Grumpycatweasel]

8 minutes ago, Resident said:

(1) Google is your friend. There are NUMEROUS videos on the subject all describing how it's a REALLY bad idea

(2) When was the last time you voted? Never in my life-time has public voting been held in a post-office. 

(3) The Conservative Party are the current party in control of the Government. They have been in power since 6th May 2010, after winning the 54th General Election. The have subsequently won the 55th-57th General Elections.

(4) You have a say. Every General Election each party produces a manifesto, Spending is part of that manifesto. You get the opportunity to vote for the party who's manifesto best aligns with your views.

 

1) Actual Proof?  The banking system is electronic and seems to be secure 
 

2) paper leaflets counted via people with a vested interest in politics versus a Computer counting votes with traceable data to avoid corruption 

 

3) They have ways to bypass the system and keep in power using malicious techniques 

 

4)General elections are to far apart to keep societies issues upto date.Its 2024 times are changing faster than an ancient system can reasonably expect to achieve 

 

Politics needs to have an Electronic system put in place 

 

No one party should have a stronger position of power over issues every citizen has to live by 

 

it’s morally not acceptable in 2024 with current technology and the future reparations are going to be substantial 

 

 

Edited February 11 by Grumpycatweasel

[Annie Bynnol]

Who is Gerg Coplando? 

 

 

[Resident]

3 hours ago, Grumpycatweasel said:

(1) The current system has our retirement age being increased? Among many other catastrophes 

 

(2) You’ve just called the public “dumb” ? Are you real? Or is this an AI bot relying to keywords? 
 

The public would be voting on issues that need government spending in order of severity 

 

there would still be a need for politicians lol

(1) Ah so now we get the real reason for this nonsense. 

(2) The general public are dumb. Most of the UK are below the average IQ of 98. But then again it's irrelevant. The issue isn't intelligence related, it's knowledge related, specifically the lack of knowledge of the economic systems of a society as complex as the UK. 

There's also the issue of your attempts to gaslight @ECCOnoob by saying they must be an AI bot because their opinion differs from your own. By the same token it could be questioned as to whether you're an AI bot. 

[Grumpycatweasel]

9 minutes ago, Grumpycatweasel said:

1) Actual Proof?  The banking system is electronic and seems to be secure 
 

2) paper leaflets counted via people with a vested interest in politics versus a Computer counting votes with traceable data to avoid corruption 

 

3) They have ways to bypass the system and keep in power using malicious techniques 

 

4)General elections are to far apart to keep societies issues upto date.Its 2024 times are changing faster than an ancient system can reasonably expect to achieve 

 

Politics needs to have an Electronic system put in place 

 

No one party should have a stronger position of power over issues every citizen has to live by 

 

it’s morally not acceptable in 2024 with current technology and the future reparations are going to be substantial 

 

 

This is 100% based 

[Grumpycatweasel]

5 minutes ago, Resident said:

(1) Ah so now we get the real reason for this nonsense. 

(2) The general public are dumb. Most of the UK are below the average IQ of 98. But then again it's irrelevant. The issue isn't intelligence related, it's knowledge related, specifically the lack of knowledge of the economic systems of a society as complex as the UK. 

There's also the issue of your attempts to gaslight @ECCOnoob by saying they must be an AI bot because their opinion differs from your own. By the same token it could be questioned as to whether you're an AI bot. 

The general public have every right to have a say in how public is spent and where its spent 

[RollingJ]

7 minutes ago, Grumpycatweasel said:

This is 100% based 

On what?

[Grumpycatweasel]

3 minutes ago, RollingJ said:

On what?

Politics needs an adaptive approach to societal needs electronically voting on Issues is the future 

 

its time it was overhauled and a new electronic system was developed and brought into use 

 

We have state of the art Teams/Zoom technology yet still seem to pay MP’s inexplicably high expenses gallivanting around london, why is that?