Delayed

Agreed. All Christians understand that they are sinners despite their beliefs, so shouldn't think they are better than anyone

Not at all. Id like some consistency applied. You would happily criticise religion in the same manner others would. Only people with an opposing view on hot topics are shut down as racist, Bogota etc etc. I'm after consistency. Religion isn't free game whereas others aren't

Interesting theory but I would respectfully disagree. Opposing opinions are certainly taboo in this forum which is widely regarded as left wing. All I'm calling out is the hypocrisy by people. Apparently belittling a person's belief system is fair game but, for example, voting leave, questioning Gender Fluidity, calling out grooming gangs etc is considered wrong..

A person's religion is very personal to people. Go into a mosque, synagogue or any place of worship and crack wise about their God. See what their reaction is. You are only doing it behind the safety of your keyboard.

Your references to sky pixies and zombies show a very childish attitude and a lack of understanding. Again, thread is about religion and the immature can only reference Christianity

So you're going to be rude and refer to someone's beliefs as delusions because you think it's ridiculous?

Fair enough but how about being adult and not referring to beliefs as delusional?

Like referring to people's religious beliefs as delusions?

He's either a troll or a terrorist sympathiser. He'd probably defend the Manchester bombers if they were captured alive

You are so predictable. As my previous post given that international lawyers are divided on the issue neither one of us are correct

Also, begum may not hold a Bangladesh passport but if she remains eligible for Bangladesh nationality she would not be rendered stateless. And she is likely to be eligible through her parents. As an aside, International Lawyers are divided on the issue so you can't say with certainty that she is stateless. And I'm sure Lawyers and the Home Office are more informed than you and Google

Care to demonstrate? She may well win her appeal but her argument would most likely be on human rights grounds not being rendered stateless. I'm fairly sure that the home secretary will be advised by advisors and lawyers whom wouldn't advise him to revoke citizenship knowing it would be an illegal act.

She does. She holds dual nationality as a Bangladesh national. Just because Bangladesh have refused to go and get her, doesn't mean she doesn't hold nationality.

He's done it with others, why is Begum any different? I would've agreed with you had her child still been alive....

But Hogan Howe was wanting them to return home asap when they were still young and without children. In which case it would've been right to treat them. But as we know she decided to stay there into adulthood, bear 3 children and sympathise with a terrorist group. How does Javid know that those entering via small boats and lorries are terrorists or genuine asylum seekers?