Jump to content
We’re excited to announce the forum is under new management! Click here for details.

AndrewC

Members
  • Content Count

    2,287
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About AndrewC

  • Rank
    Registered User
  • Birthday 03/06/1985

Personal Information

  • Location
    Sheffield
  • Interests
    things
  • Occupation
    student

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Most adult cyclists on the roads these days are also qualified drivers and as such have studied the highway code (including sections on bicycle use) as much as any other road user, and often have their bikes insured as part of their car insurance as well. Roads & pavements are paid for from general taxation, so cyclists, pedestrians are as likely to have paid a proportionate amount of tax towards the roads as any other citizen has. The VED tax applies to vehicles based on emissions, hence why pedestrians, cyclists, electric cars etc. do not have to pay it, and is not used directly to fund highways in any case.
  2. A few things; 1. the OP is talking about a mobilty scooter, not the kind of scooters I think you're referring to. With regards to 'cyclist law-breakers being ignored by the police', well: 2. Studies (I do have some links somewhere but I'll have to dig them out) have shown levels of 'law-breaking' by mode of transport are roughly even (and that takes in to account the varying numbers of drivers/cyclists/pedestrians etc), if anything motorists break the laws of the road more routinely than any other mode. 3. As most police forces will be happy to tell you; when a cyclist or pedestrian breaks the law, it results in (pretty much 100% of the time) - at most - an annoyance. When a motorist breaks the law it can frequently end up seriously injuring or killing people. The number of deaths on roads & pavements in the UK over the last 5-10 years say, caused by cyclists or scooters is still in the single figures, I believe. The number of deaths on roads & pavements in the UK over the last 5-10 years say, caused by motorists number well in to the 1,000s. And then there's the ridiculous damage costs caused by motor vehicle accidents too. Obviously you can't defend serious lawbreakers on bikes & scooters who really cause genuine issues (not just nothing-events that get some motorists a bit upset), but there are levels to this. So - long story short - you can understand why police forces that have limited resources choose to focus on lawbreakers who cause serious injury, deaths and untold damage costs to the council/insurers/public etc. and make it more of a priority than policing lawbreakers who barely register on any of those metrics, right?
  3. Of course they knew there was a reservoir there... Their issue relates to not properly designing for that fact. I've no doubt the issues will be resolved and in a decade or mores time people will have largely forgotten about this, but to refer to this as nothing more than a setback is a truly heroic stretch of positive thinking! Getting this far in to the build of quite a large building only to discover someone has screwed up so badly that it needs to be taken down again - that is quite a major setback. Even if the extra construction costs are covered somehow by insurance, the University are still going to suffer by way of this facility being probably 6-12 months behind schedule now? This is about a private-developer scheme that hasn't been properly engineered/designed and so needs to be partly or fully taken down. How does that relate to the retail quarter situation?
  4. Delivery drivers from places on Ecclesall Road; parking wherever they like (including fully on the pavements (Dominos Pizza, Cemetery Road)), pulling out and turning across the road aggressively, then shooting off at high speed, either way up Ecclesall Road or up Broomgrove/Southgrove Roads. And all to deliver a 12" pizza and some chips before it gets cold. In a 5-door estate. That's who it is rushing about round my way, anyhow..
  5. I think you and NewBiz are being a bit black & white here. It isn't true to say that no developer ever ends up building any affordable housing, ever. Of course affordable housing gets built, it's just that often the amount that is eventually agreed on and physically built is often much less than originally agreed at first, and yes, quite often that ends up being nothing. It's a tug of war between developer and council planning office - weighted by law & resources in favour of the developer - and to that end, there will be obvious losses but also some successes. Not every Developer is powerful and resourceful enough to completely overcome the planning system, and it's also fair to say that screwing over the local planning office every time isn't necessarily in a Developers interests either? I think Planner1 describes the situation very well. It's not a great one - I don't think you or Planner1 would disagree on that - but it should explain why planners do what they do. Aim high, follow the national guidance, work with what they've got to secure the most of the agreed plans and hope that they can secure as much of that as they can. What else would you have them do? Do nothing? Not bother? 5% affordable housing is better than the development not going ahead at all.
  6. What a weird comment? Clearly not true. Sure, a lot of city centre flats will tend to be focused towards students, and you have pockets outside the city centre like Ecclesall Road, Broomhill, Crookes (and even those areas still have probably just as many non-students living in the area); but the vast majority of Sheffield is free of students full stop, let alone in any great numbers.
  7. Most of The Moor has been/is being redeveloped with private investment, as most developments generally are. Save for the odd self-financed building (think the new market may have been council money?) very few developments, however civic-focussed they may appear, are proposed by the council. If developers are hot for the Moor, luke warm for the NRQ area around John Lewis, and wouldn't think about building retail or offices around castlegate even if you paid them, then the council really have to go with the flow...
  8. Chelsea Park is lovely, mainly due to the fact that it's quiet, cos no one knows about it.. I've never noticed a dog poo problem?
  9. Where? The section between Dove Holes & Whalley Bridge isn't in the peak district; there is a tiny stretch that bypasses Taddington between Buxton & Bakewell. Certainly nothing akin to the M62 though. I think dualling the Snake or Woodhead passes would be largely pointless (not to mention excessively expensive) in terms of improving speed/traffic congestion - they take you largely uninterrupted across 95% of the Peak District; the real issue is (and I don't agree with Penistone999 often/ever) the urban pinch points through Glossop, Mottram, etc.
  10. Sheffield Forum: "THE COUNCIL WASTE OUR MONEY AND ARE INEFFICIENT " Also Sheffield Forum: "Why aren't the council paying someone to wander around aimlessly looking for problems that no one has so far complained about?"
  11. There are 3 at the new HSBC building by the top of the moor, and about another 7 around top of Rockingham Street, and Hollis Croft & Garden Street working on 2-3 projects. If you're in the north, you can probably see the one in Kelham Island/Shalesmoore too
  12. This race and others have taken other routes before. The 10k used to go down Penistone Road to Hillsborough, and the half-marathon used to go Don Valley to hunters bar and back. The tour de France shut down roads right across the North of the city. Ecclesall Road is popular as it's the place with the most cafes etc. and dare I suggest It, the place most likely to have crowds coming out and lining the streets. I live near hunters bar and got all the way to Kelham Island and back during and just after the race with minimum disruption. Just cut across to Bramall Lane then round the ring road. Took maybe 2-3 mins longer than usual. Roads were actually open again by 11:30 when I went down to Ecclesall Road to the shop.
  13. Battlepup, there was not much mentioned, and not much officially reported still. Understanding is that following an altercation between two groups from the local area, a man has been shot and seriously injured. Some reports that it may be linked to a recent stabbing involving the same groups. None of this verified though. Edit: oops; partially verified in The Star, my mistake.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.