stackmonkey Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 Well, as NONE of these questions wre answered properly in the previous thread, I'll take the liberty of re-posting in the vain hope that at least one will get answered in this thread.. How would the bnp have differed from the Governments point of view in the recent Energy Review paper? What are the bnp’s environmental policies? “Tax the heavily polluting industries and invest the money in new technology” hardly covers it. BNP quote - taken from Happy hippy’s post ~556, quoting Halibut’s source "We are a political party for white European people. If a white person is a Muslim, they can be in our party." So I wonder what the BNP would make of: a British , white, gay, muslim, born of an single race marriage a British, white, straight, muslim, born of a single race marriage a British, coloured, gay muslim, born of a single race marriage a British, coloured, straight muslim, born of a single race marriage a British , white, gay, muslim, born of an interracial marriage a British, white, straight, muslim, born of an interracial marriage a British, coloured, gay muslim, born of an interracial marriage a British, coloured, straight muslim, born of an interracial marriage And then substitute 'muslim' for say 'catholic' and repeat the process.., then ‘jew’, then atheist… Answers please. Just thought I'd re post these as they still haven't been answered. You would have thought the bnp supporters would have been able to check their policies by now.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carcrash Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 I'll have a go. So I wonder what the BNP would make of: a British , white, gay, muslim, born of an single race marriage White ok, gay, ok if you don't ram it down their throats and keep it in the closet. Although some members of bnp like to make gay porn. muslim, No No No. Very bad. This if from the bnp website. The British National Party is an ethno-nationalist party. We are very pleased to work closely with members of other ethnic groups who share our desire to preserve our separate racial and cultural identities. But separate identities are not preserved by building integrationist institutions, including political parties. To do so would turn us into another cog in the global liberal capitalist identity-destroying machine, part of the old problem, not part of the new solution. For that reason (and because maintaining our stance as the defenders of an ethnically-defined British family of nations gives our members protection from unfair dismissal at work under Racial Discrimination Laws) we do not have, and will not have, any non-white or Muslim members. But then I read this We are a political party for white European people. If a white person is a Muslim, they can be in our party." Thats confusing me now. born of an single race marriage now this depends on the race. Non white or muslim is no or maybe a yes. White males and female seem to be the way to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 i think thats fair play, if your a nazi then expect abuse. Whereas I find it totally moronic (it's also illegal). No matter what beliefs people have, the kind of behaviour shown in the image linked to by CM, is totally out of order and lowers the perpretrator below that of a slugs stomach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evildrneil Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 Whereas I find it totally moronic (it's also illegal). No matter what beliefs people have, the kind of behaviour shown in the image linked to by CM, is totally out of order and lowers the perpretrator below that of a slugs stomach. I have to agree - as far as I can see it doesn't really matter what extreme they are on; left, right; ANL,BNP; extremists all tend to be blinkered, narrow minded biggots. It doesn't matter top me who performs this sort of action it just shows stupidity and propensity towards violent / illegal activitites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerny Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 I have to agree - as far as I can see it doesn't really matter what extreme they are on; left, right; ANL,BNP; extremists all tend to be blinkered, narrow minded biggots. It doesn't matter top me who performs this sort of action it just shows stupidity and propensity towards violent / illegal activitites. hrm i would have thought the liberals on here would be justifying defiling someone's home as acceptable, reasonable debate. afterall he did have a different political persuasion so violating his house is a mild and justified tactic for marxists. Afterall you're talking about the ideology that killed eighty million poeple in russia alone. As stalin said you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs and all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plekhanov Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 hrm i would have thought the liberals on here would be justifying defiling someone's home as acceptable, reasonable debate. On what grounds do you make this accusation? afterall he did have a different political persuasion so violating his house is a mild and justified tactic for marxists. Afterall you're talking about the ideology that killed eighty million poeple in russia alone. As stalin said you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs and all that. Yeah because liberal capitalists are such fans of Stalin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sccsux Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 hrm i would have thought the liberals on here would be justifying defiling someone's home as acceptable, reasonable debate. afterall he did have a different political persuasion so violating his house is a mild and justified tactic for marxists. Marx was a liberal then, was he? Afterall you're talking about the ideology that killed eighty million poeple in russia alone. What? Now your saying the BNP have marxist policies (this is a debate about BNP policies AFAIA)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.B.Yaffle Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 hrm i would have thought the liberals on here would be justifying defiling someone's home as acceptable, reasonable debate. afterall he did have a different political persuasion so violating his house is a mild and justified tactic for marxists. Afterall you're talking about the ideology that killed eighty million poeple in russia alone. As stalin said you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs and all that. Typical BNP answer! I would've thought that anyone with even half a brain cell would be able to comprehend that most people who oppose the BNP are not Marxist. Hating racism isn't exclusive to those liberal marxists you keep referring to, in fact even the Tories are opposed to the BNP's policies. Mind you, Griffin has probably taught you to regard David Cameron as a liberal and a marxist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 I'm not a liberal, in fact I'm somewhat to the right of David Cameron... and I hate the BNP ... can we move this along please ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medusa Posted August 17, 2006 Share Posted August 17, 2006 OK- part 4 is now up and running. The rules with regards to privacy and the like still apply. Please respect them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts