silentP Â Â 10 #121 Posted March 10, 2017 People are already separated into those that break laws and those that do not, a new law will have little impact I'm guessing. Driving is a game of chance with too many not giving a damn. More disturbing perhaps is their willingness to defend their driving as safe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
TORONTONY   10 #122 Posted March 10, 2017 People are taking no notice of this update on the law … I counted maybe half a dozen people over the last couple of days with a phone stuck to their ear whilst driving, a couple of them lorry drivers. The smoking ban in cars is also been ignored. We need a stiffer penalty, 12 month ban and £500 fine might make these idiots comply  Oh my god , is there a smoking ban in cars over there? That is Orwellian, and I am a non-smoker. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
truman   10 #123 Posted March 10, 2017 Oh my god , is there a smoking ban in cars over there? That is Orwellian, and I am a non-smoker.  If there are kids under 10 (I think) in the car.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
TORONTONY Â Â 10 #124 Posted March 10, 2017 If there are kids under 10 (I think) in the car.... Â Ok , that makes absolute sense, I was just gobsmacked by the statement about a smoking ban in cars being abused lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
truman   10 #125 Posted March 10, 2017 Ok , that makes absolute sense, I was just gobsmacked by the statement about a smoking ban in cars being abused lol.  Sorry,just had a quick look and it's no smoking if kids under 18 are in the car (not 10).. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
TORONTONY Â Â 10 #126 Posted March 10, 2017 Sorry,just had a quick look and it's no smoking if kids under 18 are in the car (not 10).. Â Well, how about if a 17 year old smoker is driving his own car and puffing away, merrily. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
sgtkate   10 #127 Posted March 10, 2017 Well, how about if a 17 year old smoker is driving his own car and puffing away, merrily.  Well as it's illegal to smoke until you are 18, he'd be breaking 2 laws. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
alchresearch   215 #128 Posted March 10, 2017 Well as it's illegal to smoke until you are 18, he'd be breaking 2 laws.  I think that's just for purchasing and consuming in a public place. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Becky B Â Â 31 #129 Posted March 10, 2017 Why do all arguments when someone disagrees turns into some pathetic point scoring exercise to try to prove moral superiority? It's annoying, achieves nothing except stifling debate. Whether Cyclone does or doesn't use a mobile phone while driving has ABSOLUTELY no bearing on the evidence and data driven answers he's asked for about is there actual scientific evidence that talking on a phone is more detrimental to your driving ability than talking to a passenger. Noone has yet offered evidence that is it...so of course we can ban mobile phone calls and texts whilst driving, handsfree or not, but if talking to a passenger is just as distracting then how are we going to address that? How many people are killed because someone was talking to a child in the back of their car? Â No, but from reading his responses in this thread he seems to be arguing that talking on a mobile isn't distracting, I wondered if it was from personal experience. Scientific evidence seems to be irrelevant to a large proportion of the driving population if what people see on the roads every day is any judge (how many posters on here are saying they still see people using their phones whilst driving, for example, despite the law). Â There are clearly people who think the laws don't apply to them, because they are special for some reason: "talking on a mobile doesn't distract me, that law can apply to the people it does distract", "I'm a better driver than anyone else, I don't agree with this speed limit because I'm such a good driver so I will ignore it", for example. Â And if people can't ask questions on a forum, then what is the point of posting? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
willman   10 #130 Posted March 10, 2017 I think that's just for purchasing and consuming in a public place.  Its also illegal to purchase on behalf of anyone under 18 - so technically how would anyone under 16 obtain smoking material? (Thats a question not a reproach to you) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
TORONTONY Â Â 10 #131 Posted March 10, 2017 Well as it's illegal to smoke until you are 18, he'd be breaking 2 laws. Â What is now the legal driving age in the UK? If it is now 18 then you are correct, however if it is 17 then there is nothing illegal in my scenario. Firstly he has a license to drive, he owns the car, and his car is private property and you can smoke on private property . How he got the cigarettes is not a factor as he has not committed an offence,while driving his car and should not have been pulled over in the first place, unless it was some highway code infraction. Smoking alone in your car is not an infraction. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
silentP Â Â 10 #132 Posted March 10, 2017 What is now the legal driving age in the UK? If it is now 18 then you are correct, however if it is 17 then there is nothing illegal in my scenario. Firstly he has a license to drive, he owns the car, and his car is private property and you can smoke on private property . How he got the cigarettes is not a factor as he has not committed an offence,while driving his car and should not have been pulled over in the first place, unless it was some highway code infraction. Smoking alone in your car is not an infraction. Â .....so long as it's legal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...