unbeliever Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 (edited) Weren't Socialists, Communists and Trade Unionists condemned to concentration camps in the 30s and 40s? Competing types of socialists. As I've said in-fighting doesn't mean much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism#Economics Yes some businesses were allowed to remain in private hands, but socialism calls for state ownership or state control of industry and the Nazis regulated the hell out of industry so that it could choose between serving the state and being nationalised. Just because they weren't marxist communist, doesn't mean that they weren't socialists. Socialists come in many varieties. Edited April 11, 2016 by unbeliever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berberis Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Weren't Socialists, Communists and Trade Unionists condemned to concentration camps in the 30s and 40s? Communists and Trade Unionists as they opposed some parts of the Nazi regime and were open about it, plus the Trade Unions had sided with the Communists publicly. I have never read about German socialists being sent to the concentration camps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Ah I see, and how did the Nazi's differentiate between the different types of socialists/communists/trade unionists as to who were to be condemned to the death camps and those who were to be spared? ---------- Post added 11-04-2016 at 11:52 ---------- Communists and Trade Unionists as they opposed some parts of the Nazi regime and were open about it, plus the Trade Unions had sided with the Communists publicly. I have never read about German socialists being sent to the concentration camps. https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005144 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbeliever Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Ah I see, and how did the Nazi's differentiate between the different types of socialists/communists/trade unionists as to who were to be condemned to the death camps and those who were to be spared? Why would that be a challenge? They had an ideology with a name, and rules and systems. They built a large police force and a large military. I suppose closet communists would have been safe. A closet trade unionist would be a rather useless entity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Aggressive redistribution of wealth. When you talk about aggressive redistribution of wealth, do you mean redistributing the wealth from Jews to the private arms manufacturers/other high up Nazis? Hitler's purge of the more left leaning Ernst Rohm, and his SA cemented the Nazi's position as being the leaders of an authoritarian capitalist state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbeliever Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 When you talk about aggressive redistribution of wealth, do you mean redistributing the wealth from Jews to the private arms manufacturers/other high up Nazis? Hitler's purge of the more left leaning Ernst Rohm, and his SA cemented the Nazi's position as being the leaders of an authoritarian capitalist state. The top socialists always end up rich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 The top socialists always end up rich. No disagreement from me there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyofborg Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 The top socialists always end up rich. no matter what label you apply, the top everyone always end up rich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quik Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Hardley stamped out. Luton Labour councillor suspended over Hitler tweet http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-36009544 A message on Luton councillor Aysegul Gurbuz's Twitter feed claimed Hitler was the "greatest man in history".. Another tweet on Ms Gurbaz's account suggested Iran could develop a nuclear weapon to "wipe Israel off the map". http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3533668/The-20-year-old-Labour-councillor-suspended-claims-called-Hitler-greatest-man-history-resigned-anti-Semitic-scandals-hit-Jeremy-Corbyn-s-party.html She has now resigned, though still claiming someone else sent the long string of undeleted tweets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted April 11, 2016 Share Posted April 11, 2016 Page and a half and it descends, yet again, into people bitching about those making more money than them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now