butlers Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 Wink, it will be on a graph somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
top4718 Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 1 minute ago, RollingJ said: And your reply to my post above that of sibon? I can't prove we have more restrictions but for a heavily vaccinated country with virtually no cases we shouldn't have any. Can you prove we don't have the most restrictions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 1 minute ago, top4718 said: I can't prove we have more restrictions but for a heavily vaccinated country with virtually no cases we shouldn't have any. Can you prove we don't have the most restrictions? I could, fairly easily, if I did a bit of searching, but I can't be bothered to try and prove a negative - you provide the positive proof. 2 minutes ago, butlers said: Wink, it will be on a graph somewhere. It'll be upside down. 😃 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butlers Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 I can think of one country with near 20 percent higher vaccine uptake that only just relaxed restrictions that were far tighter than ours Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
top4718 Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 An interesting read if you can take any heed of it https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-hospitals-nhs-england-data-b1862804.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RollingJ Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 1 minute ago, top4718 said: An interesting read if you can take any heed of it https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-hospitals-nhs-england-data-b1862804.html A quick read - that should have been the criteria from the start, but I can understand quite easily why it is being introduced now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
top4718 Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 14 minutes ago, RollingJ said: A quick read - that should have been the criteria from the start, but I can understand quite easily why it is being introduced now. So we can assume that previous counts have been artificially high? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carbuncle Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 2 hours ago, top4718 said: An interesting read if you can take any heed of it https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-hospitals-nhs-england-data-b1862804.html I can not get past their paywall. In any event, I think you implied earlier that you regarded the mainstream media as unreliable. I was wondering do you regard the Office for National Statistics (ONS) as also unreliable? More specifically, how do you feel about the numbers they provide on deaths from all causes? It is a data sequence that runs for many years (I think). Would that kind of data be reliable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
top4718 Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 19 minutes ago, Carbuncle said: I can not get past their paywall. In any event, I think you implied earlier that you regarded the mainstream media as unreliable. I was wondering do you regard the Office for National Statistics (ONS) as also unreliable? More specifically, how do you feel about the numbers they provide on deaths from all causes? It is a data sequence that runs for many years (I think). Would that kind of data be reliable? I said it’s an interesting read if you take heed of it, it does imply the death figures are not accurate, only time will tell but if I was a betting man I know where my money would be going. The fear is strong with this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swarfendor437 Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 (edited) https://odysee.com/CBBC-EVIL-NEWSROUND-VACCINE-PROPAGANDA-Hugo-Talks--lockdown:b84f4a0bf94ff0246b8d2870b356b972198e0048?src=embed Clearly some false information here that ignores official US Data contained in the video later on. Woman serves notice of liability on NHS trust; https://odysee.com/Woman-CALLS-NHS-and-SERVES-NOTICE-OF-LIABILITY-Hugo-Talks--lockdown:9f16742d73d5fc21077be93d8a74b4271a270c83?src=embed and hypocrite Tony Blair, funded by Bill and Melinda Gates foundation: Edited June 10, 2021 by swarfendor437 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts