Mossway 15 #901 Posted January 25, 2022 On 17/01/2022 at 20:52, Rockers rule said: The Ripper book 'the final solution' by Stephen Knight covers the whole Walter Sickert / Albert Victor, royal family connection and is as conspiracy's go one of the better 'who was Jack the Ripper books. At one stage I lived in Snettisham - just a few miles north of Sandringham- and there was a pub there called the Albert Victor ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Rockers rule 673 #902 Posted January 25, 2022 There has been talks of certain 'Duke of York' public houses being re named. There was talks of The Duke of York stakes horse race, run since 1895 also changing its name. Its now going to be called 'The nothing to do with the ostracised Duke of York stakes' . Keep safe out there . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hackey lad 3,984 #903 Posted February 15, 2022 Predictable outcome . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
geared 319 #904 Posted February 15, 2022 Paid off to make it all go away, but aren't there more accusers? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Delbow 706 #905 Posted February 15, 2022 Where's the payment coming from? Are we just paying his nonce hush money through taxation? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Delbow 706 #906 Posted February 15, 2022 13 minutes ago, West 77 said: I guess Prince Andrew's mother will be helping out with the payment. No liability has been admitted which normally happens in this type of civil case meaning there is no justification to label him a nonce. At the end of the day the women got what she wanted which was money. The money isn't going to her, as I understand it. I guess one's perspective depends on the extent to which one judges a person by the company they keep. I think that a man who has kept such close company with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and convicted under age sex trafficker for the convicted paedophile, Ghislaine Maxwell, has sh*t their pot full on that score. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mister M 1,626 #907 Posted February 15, 2022 33 minutes ago, West 77 said: I guess Prince Andrew's mother will be helping out with the payment. No liability has been admitted which normally happens in this type of civil case meaning there is no justification to label him a nonce. At the end of the day the women got what she wanted which was money. Defending Boris Johnson and 'Prince' Andrew. You can't half pick 'em Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hackey lad 3,984 #908 Posted February 15, 2022 21 minutes ago, Delbow said: The money isn't going to her, as I understand it. I guess one's perspective depends on the extent to which one judges a person by the company they keep. I think that a man who has kept such close company with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and convicted under age sex trafficker for the convicted paedophile, Ghislaine Maxwell, has sh*t their pot full on that score. It is Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ECCOnoob 1,050 #909 Posted February 15, 2022 2 hours ago, geared said: Paid off to make it all go away, but aren't there more accusers? Or the alternative is, she was just after the money as predicted. So much for getting to the truth, getting her side of the story out there, getting all this so-called evidence disclosed.. Well done love, you've done it again, another easy target with a public reputation to damage, another easy cheque without any credible evidence tested before a court.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hackey lad 3,984 #910 Posted February 15, 2022 2 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said: Or the alternative is, she was just after the money as predicted. So much for getting to the truth, getting her side of the story out there, getting all this so-called evidence disclosed.. Well done love, you've done it again, another easy target with a public reputation to damage, another easy cheque without any credible evidence tested before a court.. Got to agree with you Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mister M 1,626 #911 Posted February 15, 2022 2 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said: Or the alternative is, she was just after the money as predicted. So much for getting to the truth, getting her side of the story out there, getting all this so-called evidence disclosed.. Well done love, you've done it again, another easy target with a public reputation to damage, another easy cheque without any credible evidence tested before a court.. He should've refused the money going to the charity and set out the truth in court then shouldn't he Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hackey lad 3,984 #912 Posted February 15, 2022 1 minute ago, Mister M said: He should've refused the money going to the charity and set out the truth in court then shouldn't he Or you could say , she should have stood her ground and had her day in court Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...