plekhanov Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Probably intimidated by the likes of you and plek,still some of us aernt scared of you lot. How terribly, all us nasty rationalists repressing you poor bigots and intimidating you with our nasty facts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plekhanov Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Dont worry grahame your view is the one that the vast majority agree with,dont let the queer mafia on here put you off. Really, and what grounds do you have for accusing all those who don't oppose gay adoption of being 'queer'? Just recently you seem to have become concerned with stoping whale hunting should I assume from this that you are in fact a whale and a member of the 'whale mafia'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenH Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 I can't see any reason why we need to treat everyone the same. If there is one child up for adoption and 100 couples apply then they should take all circumstances into account and give the child to the married hetrosexual couple with their own children who live on a small farm with stables. If, on the other hand, there are 100 children looking for parents and 100 applicants, then any that aren't child molesters or armed robbers will probably be better than a care home. It seems to me that two blokes, whether gay or not, won't generally be as good as a married couple, all other things being equal (which they never are) but it doesn't all have to be perfect does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
depoix Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Really, and what grounds do you have for accusing all those who don't oppose gay adoption of being 'queer'? Just recently you seem to have become concerned with stoping whale hunting should I assume from this that you are in fact a whale and a member of the 'whale mafia'? what a pathetic responce, was it the word queer that triggered it? or the fact that you couldnt give roy james a decent reply,his views differ from yours,so what?,but at least give him a reasoned argument Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plekhanov Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 what a pathetic responce, was it the word queer that triggered it? or the fact that you couldnt give roy james a decent reply,his views differ from yours,so what?,but at least give him a reasoned argument What was pathetic about it? Roy accused those who don't oppose gay adoption of being in the 'queer mafia' simply because they aren't homophobic bigots. I responded by using the example of the whales to point out that it's rather dumb to assume people must automatically be a member of any group who's rights they stand up for. Is that reasoning really too complicated for you to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 what a pathetic responce, was it the word queer that triggered it? or the fact that you couldnt give roy james a decent reply,his views differ from yours,so what?,but at least give him a reasoned argument A reasoned argument to what? The accusation of being part of a 'queer mafia'? Does that deserve a reasoned response, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 what a pathetic responce, was it the word queer that triggered it? or the fact that you couldnt give roy james a decent reply,his views differ from yours,so what?,but at least give him a reasoned argument A decent reply? A decent question would have made a start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr1chop Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 People who oppose gay adoption are quite rightly 'branded as homophobes' as there are no reasons other than homophobia to oppose it. That is your opinion not a majority opinion, I am unsure on where I stand on the subject but I would need proof that this kind of family would not hurt the child or that it would before I could wade in. Not being a Homophobe of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr1chop Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Wasn't who a male couple What difference would it make to anything if they were? There is a world of difference between men and women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
depoix Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 A reasoned argument to what? The accusation of being part of a 'queer mafia'? Does that deserve a reasoned response, then?of course it does,or why bother replying at all reading between the lines,i think roy james meant that once he posts anything anti gay on here then all the gays and their friends band together to try to ridicule him,hence the referance to the mafia,i often wonder if sometimes he purposely sets his posts out to be contraversial just for the responce he will get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts