Mind the gap it is getting BIGGER

[Naive]

It is 13. Here's the results for the first 10 SWFC league games.

 

5 Aug L 1-0 Preston – 4 of the named players missing.

12 Aug D 1-1 QPR – 4 missing.

16 Aug D 1-1 Sunderland – 3 missing.

19 Aug W 1-0 Fulham – 3 missing.

26 Aug D 1-1 Burton – 4 missing.

9 Sept W 3-1 Forest – 3 missing

12 Sept W 2-1 Brentford – 3 missing

16 Sept D 1-1 Cardiff – 4 missing

24 Sept L 4-2 Blades – 5 missing

1 Oct L 1-0 Birmingham – 4 missing

 

It gets worse then, you can't even type. You said:

 

"LDDWDWWWDLL"

 

 

Which is 16 points

[pintor]

It is 13. Here's the results for the first 10 SWFC league games.

 

5 Aug L 1-0 Preston – 4 of the named players missing.

12 Aug D 1-1 QPR – 4 missing.

16 Aug D 1-1 Sunderland – 3 missing.

19 Aug W 1-0 Fulham – 3 missing.

26 Aug D 1-1 Burton – 4 missing.

9 Sept W 3-1 Forest – 3 missing

12 Sept W 2-1 Brentford – 3 missing

16 Sept D 1-1 Cardiff – 4 missing

24 Sept L 4-2 Blades – 5 missing

1 Oct L 1-0 Birmingham – 4 missing

 

Give up mate, looks like they're going to have a 16/17 Man team when all are fit!

[top4718]

Give up mate, looks like they're going to have a 16/17 Man team when all are fit!

 

No, just a first choice 11.

[SomeNextGuy]

So, about the Wednesday thing. To conclude, they're alright when they have everyone fully fit.

[top4718]

Yep, my mistake there. 1.3 ppg is mid-table form. Worth sacking the manager for?

 

Seeing the aim was promotion yes, of course.

[Sheridan1-0]

I want to see what difference these players being there or not made.

 

I'm not trying to prove anything. I want to see how much truth there is to the claims of SWFC's season being blighted by injury.

 

I've looked at the first 10 matches. 7 points gained from a possible 30. The sequence was LDDWDWWWDLL

 

Of the players mentioned above:

Forestieri

Hooper

Fletcher

Lee

Abdi

Westwood

Lees

Bannan

Hutchinson

Matias

Van Aken

 

Most of them played in most of those matches. 3 were missing for 4 games; 4 were missing for 5 games; 5 were missing for 1 game.

 

Well done Poirot..... youre wrong..but commendable effort nice that you'd go to all this trouble to try and prove a point ...what next..? The Titanic didn't sink...Elvis is not dead...:hihi:

[Naive]

So, about the Wednesday thing. To conclude, they're alright when they have everyone fully fit.

 

Pretty much.

 

Could probably do with a bit of power in midfield and another versatile defender

[top4718]

So, about the Wednesday thing. To conclude, they're alright when they have everyone fully fit.

 

I said at the beginning of the season that the squad was unbalanced and not good enough for automatic, with a fully fit squad (or a couple out) top 6 should have been acheivable, not guarenteed but the previous two seasons suggest it was not an unrealistic expectation, the early blow of losing FF was a huge factor.

[barry-333]

I love how even after all these years united fans dont get that this is and has always been said ironically, some even type it in capital letters to make the point, hilarious.

 

---------- Post added 24-04-2018 at 10:16 ----------

 

 

I find it really interesting that 10 players out inc Hooper, Bannan, Westwood and Forestieri who are amongst the divisions best (oh and Tom Lees) don't count towards having a troubled season but in 2012 when United had Ched Evans unavailable to play it was the one and only reason Wednesday got promoted above them - the wisdom of the football fan.:hihi:

 

You must admit Ched Evans was red hot at the time, scoring freely and losing him at the crucial part of a season was a huge knock for the complete side and with him I think we would have got promotion Wed may have also got promotion as they got the results that mattered at the time

[Antone]

Seeing the aim was promotion yes, of course.

Of course? Fulham and Villa were in just as poor form at the time.