Jump to content

Predict outcome of June 2017 UK General Election here


predict outcome of June 2017 General Election here  

59 members have voted

  1. 1. predict outcome of June 2017 General Election here

    • ***
      0
    • Conservative majority 100 +
      4
    • Conservative majority 76-100
      6
    • Conservative majority 51-75
      7
    • Conservative majority 26-50
      19
    • Conservative majority 1-25
      8
    • Conservative no majority, but largest party
      6
    • Labour and Conservative equal number of seats
      1
    • Labour no majority, but largest party
      1
    • Labour majority 1-25
      2
    • Labour majority 26-50
      1
    • Labour majority 50 +
      3
    • ***
      1


Recommended Posts

Earlier, mate, earlier, the referendum is 12 months old and our common stance goes back well before it ;)

 

But we sure have had some proper political ding-dongs (I might have put you on ignore awhile back then, I daren't search :D) in times gone by.

 

Mostly because I took my time gravitating closer to the centre ground. Credit to you and a few others on here and elsewhere. Even to Anna, whose eyes I'll never stop trying to open: she means well, and is worth it by reason of same. Pinkman, take a leaf, freely and gladly given :)

 

Yes, this is true. It's 18 months or more we've been arguing against Brexit. Time flies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Earlier, mate, earlier, the referendum is 12 months old and our common stance goes back well before it ;)

 

But we sure have had some proper political ding-dongs (I might have put you on ignore awhile back then, I daren't search :D) in times gone by.

 

Mostly because I took my time gravitating closer to the centre ground. Credit to you and a few others on here and elsewhere. Even to Anna, whose eyes I'll never stop trying to open: she means well, and is worth it by reason of same. Pinkman, take a leaf, freely and gladly given :)

 

And I think you've hit the nail on the head. There are some posters on here who I am outright rude to in pretty much every post and to someone new to the forum who perhaps doesn't know the kinds of stuff that has been posted in past might think I'm being nasty, when really I'm just responding to years of hatred and bile from some posters and I cannot be anything other than exceptionally short with them. Equally some other posters I'll give a lot more time and energy too even if they post something that seems to be nasty, Anna is one of those. This is because I've read enough of her posts to know that at least on SF she isn't nasty or thoughtless. She might be a bit overly concerned by certain conspiracy theories but that doesn't make her nasty. This goes for posters of all political stances. I can disagree quite happily with most people!

 

I also understand the point you are making Pinkman in saying how can someone critique somethings if they haven't actually seen it. To be fair to Anna, that wasn't what she said. Let me quote her:

 

No, I wasn't paying attention, and only heard a bit of it as I was watching the other channel as well. I was in fact, defending Nick Clegg when someone was slagging him off after all he's done, by saying his replacement didn't look that great.

 

So she says she had it on but wasn't paying attention to it. So she made a quick judgement on someone she was watching not listening to. Something we all do every day. Once she finds out there is a reason why he looks uninspiring because his disability limits his physical prowess she admits it completely changes the context of what she saw, because it does.

 

Is there anything at all unreasonable about Anna's stance now? Or shall we continue to play your game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some interesting statistics from the election:

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40331136

 

According to YouGov, class is "no longer a very good indicator of voting intention", finding little difference among the different socio-economic groupings between the two largest parties.

 

In a reversal of the traditional class divide in British politics, Ipsos Mori found: "The middle classes swung to Labour, while working classes swung to the Conservatives."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't forget, Hallam was and really is, if it was in any other part of the country, a typical Tory seat which Labour for many many years thought was totally beyond their grasp. It must be the #1 seat in the country which voted Labour, but has the highest income levels, educational qualifications, and so on. Hallam is a big gain for Labour.

 

WRONG. Hallam is the #2 Labour seat in the country like that. The #1, is London West Kensington which Labour gained in 2017 by a 20 vote majority. It was the last result called of the 650.

 

a bloody good and a very interesting election, with scores of interesting individual counts and results. Historians will always wonder why May called it, when she had a comfortable parliamentary majority of 16 anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a bloody good and a very interesting election, with scores of interesting individual counts and results. Historians will always wonder why May called it, when she had a comfortable parliamentary majority of 16 anyway.

Yes. I've heard tell that it was in order to wipe-out UKIP as a rival home for disgruntled Conservative anti-EU membership sentiment.

If that's so, it largely (but not entirely) succeeded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.