Binsniffer Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 he hasnt escaped inmates justice has he? wasnt it the ripper whos been attacked and stabbed in BOTH eyes previously? Â "They" .. missed then ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 Wasn't he given 20X life sentences? 13 for the Murders, and 7 for the attempted murders on the women he left for dead, but who survived, maimed? Â If we class the life sentence as only 15 years, that's 20 x 15 years, which = 300 years. Â So, okay. fine. If he is now cured of the Schizophrenia, let him go back to prison and finish serving the sentence. Â Then let him apply for his parole. Â In the year 2381. Sorted! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricgem2002 Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 i think he was ordered to serve at least 30 years before being eligable for parole which if my mind serves me right will be up next year . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
depoix Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 Too true.. but who is going to foot the bill I wonder for a seemingly pointless exercise ?the tax payer foots the bill the mail says he has been granted £ 50,000 in legal aid , why i wonder should it cost so much to write to the home secretary requesting the information he wants ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex3659 Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 The strangest thing about the ripper case was the fact that they declared him sane when they had the trail so that they could give him a prison sentence, then they stick him in the cuckoos nest after declaring him insane. All done totally so he couldn't go straight into hospital and after a while declared cured and released. A completely bent process, anyone who thinks that man was sane should be in the next room to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricgem2002 Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 the tax payer foots the bill the mail says he has been granted £ 50,000 in legal aid , why i wonder should it cost so much to write to the home secretary requesting the information he wants ? whatever the cost its the law that dictates what needs to be done .seeing as he has been locked up for 30 odd years and not got any savings he is entitled to legal aid . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 The strangest thing about the ripper case was the fact that they declared him sane when they had the trail so that they could give him a prison sentence, then they stick him in the cuckoos nest after declaring him insane. All done totally so he couldn't go straight into hospital and after a while declared cured and released. A completely bent process, anyone who thinks that man was sane should be in the next room to him. Â Alex, he was gaoled in May of 1981, after his trial. He wasn't declared insane, and moved to Broadmoor until 1984 (despite him obviously having to have been totally bat-poop insane to have done the crimes he did) Â The trial lasted two weeks and Sutcliffe was found guilty of murder on all 13counts and sentenced to life imprisonment. The trial judge said that Sutcliffe was "beyond redemption", and that he hoped that he "would never leave prison". He recommended a minimum term of 30 years to be served before parole is considered. This recommendation meant that Sutcliffe was unlikely to be freed until at least 2011, at the age of 65. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plain Talker Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 whatever the cost its the law that dictates what needs to be done .seeing as he has been locked up for 30 odd years and not got any savings he is entitled to legal aid .  So, does this mean that Sutcliffe has managed to spend all of the alleged £200,000 compensation he is supposed to have received, after the attack in which he was partially blinded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex3659 Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 Alex, he was gaoled in May of 1981, after his trial. He wasn't declared insane, and moved to Broadmoor until 1984 (despite him obviously having to have been totally bat-poop insane to have done the crimes he did)Â The trial lasted two weeks and Sutcliffe was found guilty of murder on all 13counts and sentenced to life imprisonment. The trial judge said that Sutcliffe was "beyond redemption", and that he hoped that he "would never leave prison". He recommended a minimum term of 30 years to be served before parole is considered. This recommendation meant that Sutcliffe was unlikely to be freed until at least 2011, at the age of 65. Â I know all that, the point is he was declared sane to stand trial, anyone who said he was sane is as mad as him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistyraven Posted March 1, 2010 Share Posted March 1, 2010 How time flys I can remember when he got caught seems like yesterday. Leave him in to die in prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now