Should organised religion be banned?

[skippy_54 10]

The bible was not a work of fiction,it was a book of rules that were sensible in their day and It was a history book. But through missinterpritation, misstranslation and the addition of a science fiction chapter at the end it has no relevence in this day and age.

[viney40 10]

Originally Posted by flamingjimmy

You seem to have misunderstood my post, only the first question was rhetorical.

 

"How naive can you be?

 

How on earth would you go about enforcing a ban on religion without using force?

 

Also how would you deal with all the people like me who would take to the streets in angry protest?"

 

I honestly think the best way for us to take this debate forward would be for you to answer the second two questions rather than making an unrelated point.

Yes, how would you deal with the many thousands who protest?

 

How could you deal with mass civil disobedience without force?

__________________

quote. Confirm by law that the bible is a work of fiction, which it is.

 

Remove the 26 frocks/ pimps from the house of lords.

 

Ignore the protesters.

 

You would get no trouble from the Christian's, as they are not involved in religion, just faith. They are selfless according to Grahame and would simply fall into line.

[Halibut 12]

You like calling people names who dont agree wtih you.

You do it a lot. Maybe you need help.

 

Do you not agree that someone proposing banning the freedom to practise your faith is naive and stupid in thinking that there wouldn't be a huge popular protest and widespread civil disobedience if such a law were ever imposed?

 

It would make the poll tax protests look tame.

[viney40 10]

:

Do you not agree that someone proposing banning the freedom to practise your faith is naive and stupid in thinking that there wouldn't be a huge popular protest and widespread civil disobedience if such a law were ever imposed?

 

It would make the poll tax protests look tame.

 

I would agree, but without the name calling.

[Halibut 12]

:

 

I would agree, but without the name calling.

 

How would you describe the belief that one could ban religion without there being massive unrest and civil disobedience?

[jobee 10]

If you were to ignore the protestors presumably you would also ignore anyone who chose to practise their faith in the way they see fit; in that case why all this talk of a ban?

 

What would be the point of a law proclaiming the bible a work of fiction?

 

What would you do with people who broke the law?

 

You really haven't thought this through have you?

 

I said 'organised'' religion. telling lies and pimping off the gullible .

 

What people do in the privacy of their home is their business.

 

Have you read the thread? we have already covered this.

[viney40 10]

How would you describe the belief that one could ban religion without there being massive unrest and civil disobedience?

 

I would describe it as a belief!

[Halibut 12]

I would describe it as a belief!

 

A naive and foolish one.

[viney40 10]

A naive and foolish one.

 

No more naive or foolish than any religious belief, simply a belief.

[jobee 10]

You like calling people names who dont agree wtih you.

You do it a lot. Maybe you need help.

 

 

 

I know the book is crap, but prelates get top jobs in british politics after spending their lives reading crap to the public and pimping money off them.

[jobee 10]

So how would you cope with mass civil disobedience?

How much force would you be prepared to exert in trying to impose the ban?

 

I know for sure they would get no help from their goddy boy.

[Halibut 12]

I know for sure they would get no help from their goddy boy.

 

That's a pretty lame answer if you're expecting anyone to take you seriously.

How would you enforce the law?

What would be the penalty for disobeying the law?