COVID THREAD

[trastrick 866]

34 minutes ago, RJRB said:

Of course the vast majority of people want to carry on with whatever they consider to normality before the visitation of this virus.

That is not to deny the various peaks and troughs and apparent severity of infections over the last 2 years.

So tomorrow we will have the official line which will pass responsibility back to the general population which for most will be welcome.(Although in all honesty there has been little effect on my own life since the closure of public facilities and restrictions on family meetings.

However I do feel for those who have a responsibility for others and will watch with interest how some situations such as hospitals,surgeries ,care homes manage the new freedoms.

I am sure that if I were to visit one of the vulnerable categories that I would wear a suitable mask if only to respect their situation.

 

You need a mask to show your respect? Nobody is stopping you.

 

This thread is about government mandates to be injected by experimental drugs that have yet to pass previous approval standards, (they have been approved for emergency use), and coercion to do so,

 

 

[RJRB 688]

47 minutes ago, trastrick said:

You need a mask to show your respect? Nobody is stopping you.

 

This thread is about government mandates to be injected by experimental drugs that have yet to pass previous approval standards, (they have been approved for emergency use), and coercion to do so,

 

 

Well done for completely missing the point as you pursue your own strange agenda.

When I said respect I meant that some people needed the maximum safeguards for their own health.

So if you visited a recovering patient who could be badly affected with the additional burden of Covid.Thats respect.

Or the other side of the coin would be ignorant

Edited February 20, 2022 by RJRB

[hackey lad 3,991]

50 minutes ago, trastrick said:

You need a mask to show your respect? Nobody is stopping you.

 

This thread is about government mandates to be injected by experimental drugs that have yet to pass previous approval standards, (they have been approved for emergency use), and coercion to do so,

 

 

No it’s not 

[The_DADDY 3,479]

So, Triple jabbed queenie apparently has convid. 

Clearly the experimental cocktail works a treat 😁

 

[RJRB 688]

2 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

So, Triple jabbed queenie apparently has convid. 

Clearly the experimental cocktail works a treat 😁

 

Foolish comment

[The_DADDY 3,479]

3 minutes ago, RJRB said:

Foolish comment

Yeah I know, of course the jab doesn't work.

What was I thinking.

[RJRB 688]

3 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Yeah I know, of course the jab doesn't work.

What was I thinking.

Still more stupid comment

[HeHasRisen 3,411]

1 minute ago, RJRB said:

Still more stupid comment

Rather than just saying this, why dont you just explain why its stupid or foolish?

[The_DADDY 3,479]

Just now, RJRB said:

Still more stupid comment

Yet your last 2 comments added so much didn't they 🙄

[RJRB 688]

Just now, HeHasRisen said:

Rather than just saying this, why dont you just explain why its stupid or foolish?

Because I have no real desire to differentiate between a vaccine that lessens hospitalisation and serious illness with the suggestions that it should stop infections.

Discuss ...for the umpteenth time

[The_DADDY 3,479]

2 minutes ago, RJRB said:

Because I have no real desire to differentiate between a vaccine 

Snipped 

You missed the word experimental. 

I'm sure it was just a mistake on your part though.

[RJRB 688]

Just now, The_DADDY said:

You missed the word experimental. 

I'm sure it was just a mistake on your part though.

No mistake.

All medical breakthroughs are experimental.

As for trials have you not noticed the exponential increase in technologies across the board or are you still stuck in your time warp