Can we trust William Hague/ US intelligence?

[WeX 10]

"as yet neither the current US or UK governments has taken our armies into an illegal war."

 

Only because they made war crimes legal for those flying certain flags.

 

Which wars did the Obama and Cameron governments start?

[S10mainly 10]

Saddam Hussein not only possessed chemical weapons, he used them

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_poison_gas_attack

[Thistledoo 10]

Can we really trust William Hague with anything?

What a slap in the face for people suffering with the cuts!!!!!

 

 

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/355783/Taxpayers-10-000-bill-to-stuff-William-Hague-s-snake

[vResistance 10]

Can we really trust William Hague with anything?

What a slap in the face for people suffering with the cuts!!!!!

 

 

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/355783/Taxpayers-10-000-bill-to-stuff-William-Hague-s-snake

 

£10,000 on a dead snake.

It's probably one of his relatives.

See David Icke was right.

 

---------- Post added 11-12-2012 at 14:41 ----------

 

Which wars did the Obama and Cameron governments start?

 

The muppets you keep voting are just different wings of the same bird and when on the perch it whistles the same tune. (I just made that up, like it?)

They are complicit.

 

Saddam Hussein not only possessed chemical weapons, he used them

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_poison_gas_attack

 

But not at the time of the invasion, he did his best to prove it but it didn't stop the invasion.

[WeX 10]

Can we really trust William Hague with anything?

What a slap in the face for people suffering with the cuts!!!!!

 

 

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/355783/Taxpayers-10-000-bill-to-stuff-William-Hague-s-snake

 

Don't suck down everything you read with such relish. The snake did not belong to Hague it belongs to the Foreign Office. It is 120 years old and considered a national treasure by the Natural History museum.

[L00b 441]

Saddam Hussein not only possessed chemical weapons, he used them

Saddam Hussein had not had WMDs in any offensive capacity since the end of the first Gulf War. Repeat enquiries, searches and investigations found as much. example link (there are many more, from more authoritative sources). Edited December 11, 2012 by L00b

[XXTickerXX 10]

Hopefully the Russians have given the SAA some Iskander missiles that make fun of patriot missile batteries all day long.Then the SAA can concentrate on killing jihadists.

 

Then i hope Russia will move in to the region and wipe out the terrorist scum before they have to deal with them down the line.

 

Any NATO move still has to contend with S-300 Missile batteries.It`s nothing at all like Libya.They will bring lots of planes down.

 

---------- Post added 11-12-2012 at 15:12 ----------

 

Like any other government would have? :hihi:

 

That's about the most stupid statement I've heard in all the time I've been on the SF

 

You've surpassed even yourself this time

 

So when the US government has Iran supplying arms and money to terrorists on American soil using suicide bombers and killing lots of civilians and anyone who supports the government are they are going to sit around having cups of tea or send the army in to sort out out?

[Obelix 11]

Hopefully the Russians have given the SAA some Iskander missiles that make fun of patriot missile batteries all day long.Then the SAA can concentrate on killing jihadists.

 

Then i hope Russia will move in to the region and wipe out the terrorist scum before they have to deal with them down the line.

 

Any NATO move still has to contend with S-300 Missile batteries.It`s nothing at all like Libya.They will bring lots of planes down.

 

Umm, just putting lots of missiles in place doenst mean you will bring lots of planes down. Syria tried that before in the Bekaa Valley and got utterly creamed

[andygardener 10]

Umm, just putting lots of missiles in place doenst mean you will bring lots of planes down. Syria tried that before in the Bekaa Valley and got utterly creamed

 

Quite. Not to mention that if it ever got to the point where NATO felt it had no option but to get involved the certainty of Assad's regime falling would be 100% and trying to persuade many of the remaining regime forces to stand next to B2 and TLAM targets would be fairly tricky.

[XXTickerXX 10]

Umm, just putting lots of missiles in place doenst mean you will bring lots of planes down. Syria tried that before in the Bekaa Valley and got utterly creamed

 

Iskanders are not for bringing planes down they are ballistic supersonic missiles that travel at mach 7.5.

Patriots travel at mach 5.

 

http://hamsayeh.net/world/2550-russia-arms-syria-with-powerful-ballistic-missiles.html

 

It could also be pure BS just like the UK spouts about Syria.

[Harleyman 12]

Hopefully the Russians have given the SAA some Iskander missiles that make fun of patriot missile batteries all day long.Then the SAA can concentrate on killing jihadists.

 

Then i hope Russia will move in to the region and wipe out the terrorist scum before they have to deal with them down the line.

 

Any NATO move still has to contend with S-300 Missile batteries.It`s nothing at all like Libya.They will bring lots of planes down.

 

---------- Post added 11-12-2012 at 15:12 ----------

 

 

So when the US government has Iran supplying arms and money to terrorists on American soil using suicide bombers and killing lots of civilians and anyone who supports the government are they are going to sit around having cups of tea or send the army in to sort out out?

 

 

---------- Post added 11-12-2012 at 17:55 ----------

 

Hopefully the Russians have given the SAA some Iskander missiles that make fun of patriot missile batteries all day long.Then the SAA can concentrate on killing jihadists.

 

Then i hope Russia will move in to the region and wipe out the terrorist scum before they have to deal with them down the line.

 

Any NATO move still has to contend with S-300 Missile batteries.It`s nothing at all like Libya.They will bring lots of planes down.

 

---------- Post added 11-12-2012 at 15:12 ----------

 

 

So when the US government has Iran supplying arms and money to terrorists on American soil using suicide bombers and killing lots of civilians and anyone who supports the government are they are going to sit around having cups of tea or send the army in to sort out out?

 

I am unable to understand a word of what you're talking about.

Edited December 11, 2012 by Harleyman

[andygardener 10]

Iskanders are not for bringing planes down they are ballistic supersonic missiles that travel at mach 7.5.

Patriots travel at mach 5.

 

http://hamsayeh.net/world/2550-russia-arms-syria-with-powerful-ballistic-missiles.html

 

It could also be pure BS just like the UK spouts about Syria.

 

Ya think? The Iranian Revolutionary Guard talking blatant rubbish? Who'd have guessed it?