MrMoran Posted February 25, 2012 Author Share Posted February 25, 2012 Interesting use of the term 'accident'. That's not accident in the sense of someone carelessly droping a fag end or a match is it though? The holy books were confiscated from prisoners and burned - the US military has quite rightly apologised, but it shouldn't have happened in the first place.  It wasnt exactly deliberate, it was stupid, mornoic, and a whole host of other things but you cant get away from the fact it was a mistake, a geniuine human error. Is it really worth a single hair on someone head let alone all the deaths there have been and the many more there will likely be??. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 It wasnt exactly deliberate, it was stupid, mornoic, and a whole host of other things but you cant get away from the fact it was a mistake, a geniuine human error. Is it really worth a single hair on someone head let alone all the deaths there have been and the many more there will likely be??. Â No, as I've already indicated. The anger and violence are understandable however even if they're regrettable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaimani Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Cant see where you get that from. I dont want any particular answer. Just honest ones. If you cant seethat then thats your problem mate. However, i suspect your trying to scew the OP in some way, to try and deflect what is a genuine question. Heres a tip, dont. Youll only look daft  That’s not, and never has been my intention. And everyone who 'knows' me here knows it's not my thing. But, all good. Let’s agree to not agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMoran Posted February 25, 2012 Author Share Posted February 25, 2012 No, as I've already indicated. The anger and violence are understandable however even if they're regrettable. Â How so? .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMoran Posted February 25, 2012 Author Share Posted February 25, 2012 That’s not, and never has been my intention. And everyone who 'knows' me here knows it's not my thing. But, all good. Let’s agree to not agree.  Im good with that:thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaimani Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 My bold. Outstanding!! Thank you for your honesty  The lawyer thing again. I can cut and paste and ‘bold’ YOUR posts to make it seem as if you’re saying all sorts. Back to the topic, such as it is-I think we’ve run the course of our ‘discussion’. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMoran Posted February 25, 2012 Author Share Posted February 25, 2012 The lawyer thing again. I can cut and paste and ‘bold’ YOUR posts to make it seem as if you’re saying all sorts. Back to the topic, such as it is-I think we’ve run the course of our ‘discussion’.  Be my guest. Although why youd do that and what you think the debate would gain from that is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaimani Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Be my guest. Although why youd do that and what you think the debate would gain from that is beyond me.  Was just making a point. The debate we had, such as it was, ran its course. You phrased the question the way you want it. It pointed out what I thought is a flaw, you didn’t see that. I said why I thought it was a flaw. You said why you didn’t think it is. We gave up. Well, I did. It’s your thread. I REALLY don’t want to derail it. I’m actually finding it interesting; the points of view being put across. Will chime in when I think I’ve got something to say. But not looking to derail your train of thought. Nothing to be gained there. You’re right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halibut Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 How so? .. Â Understandable inasmuch as those who are angry see the act as a gross insult to something they hold very dear - the most important symbol of their entire faith and culture. Surely you can see that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMoran Posted February 25, 2012 Author Share Posted February 25, 2012 Was just making a point. The debate we had, such as it was, ran its course.  And we agreed to disagree. Then low and behold you want to discuss again.  You phrased the question the way you want it. The easiest way that the most people would get.  It pointed out what I thought is a flaw, you didn’t see that. Because there was no floor. Not unless you really want there to be one. I dont, im impartial, im just here to debate stuff.  You said why you didn’t think it is.  And i think i have avalid point, dont you?  We gave up. Well, I did. It’s your thread. Thats the point, it isnt really. Its here for everyone to share their views weather i like them or not.  I REALLY don’t want to derail it.  Fair enough.  I’m actually finding it interesting; the points of view being put across.  I agree, it seems to be shaping up to be one of the better threads of this ilk.  Will chime in when I think I’ve got something to say. But not looking to derail your train of thought. Nothing to be gained there. . Cant argue with that  You’re right.  Well i have to say thats very decent of you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts