Evidence Bombs were planted beneath trains on 7/7

[Thunzi]

RobFR - If you wish to use the quote function please ensure you use it correctly. Let us know if you need any help with this. Thanks.

[RobFr]

RobFR - If you wish to use the quote function please ensure you use it correctly. Let us know if you need any help with this. Thanks.

 

 

Thank-you for your kind offer GazE. I bounce between using the quote function and doing a question and answer format depending on which seems easiest at the time to use to respond.

 

If it is preferred, I could do the same thing with the quote function. Please advise if that would be better.

 

Peace be upon you,

Rob

[Thunzi]

Please use the quote function when directly responding to a piece of text written by another user. You can still break this up into multiple sections and respond to each piece accordingly. Thanks.

[RobFr]

There is no available evidence for this beyond the assertion in the Ripple Effect - which is mainly fantasy based round a handful of facts.

 

There is a very detailed and thoroughly research paper by Dr. Rory Ridley-Duff entitled "What Happened at Canary Wharf on 7th July 2005?" which has been previously quoted on this forum. You really should read it before jumping to conclusions about things you know nothing about.

[RobFr]

Apart from Power using the same scenario as he used on Panorama the year before which could have easily been viewed by one or more of the bombers.

 

 

The scenario that was portrayed on the BBC Panorama show "London under Attack" in May 2004 did have Peter Power on it and did involve 3 tube trains and an above ground vehicle. The 3 tube trains were at different locations than the ones that the actual bombs went off under and the above ground vehicle in the programme was a chlorine tanker truck instead of a double-decker bus.

 

On the 7th of July 2005, Peter Power and his firm Visor Consultants were conducting a mock terror exercise/drill, for an unnamed client, in the exact same locations where the real bombs went off. In other words, in the same tube trains and in the same double-decker bus.

 

At this point one has to wonder if you are simply incompetent or you are willfully trying to mislead people with your repeated disinformation.

 

So which is it Longcol?

 

Are you incompetent or are you willfully trying to spread disinformation?

Edited December 26, 2010 by RobFr

[Longcol]

There is a very detailed and thoroughly research paper by Dr. Rory Ridley-Duff entitled "What Happened at Canary Wharf on 7th July 2005?" which has been previously quoted on this forum. You really should read it before jumping to conclusions about things you know nothing about.

 

Yes, well aware of it - Ridley-Duff was given a good pasting on this forum.

 

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=157202

[Longcol]

The scenario that was portrayed on the BBC Panorama show "London under Attack" in May 2004 did have Peter Power on it and did involve 3 tube trains and an above ground vehicle. The 3 tube trains were at different locations than the ones that the actual bombs went off under and the above ground vehicle in the programme was a chlorine tanker truck instead of a double-decker bus.

 

On the 7th of July 2005, Peter Power and his firm Visor Consultants were conducting a mock terror exercise/drill, for an unnamed client, in the exact same locations where the real bombs went off. In other words, in the same tube trains and in the same double-decker bus.

 

At this point one has to wonder if you are simply incompetent or you are willfully trying to mislead people with your repeated disinformation.

 

So which is it Longcol?

 

Are you incompetent or are you willfully trying to spread disinformation?

 

Just read posts #191 - 193 on this thread - already answered.

 

Please read the whole threads.

[RobFr]

Just read posts #191 - 193 on this thread - already answered.

 

Please read the whole threads.

 

 

I have read posts #191-193, which is more reason to ask the question that you haven't answered yet regarding your apparent desire to spread disinformation, whether it be willfully or otherwise.

[Longcol]

I have read posts #191-193, which is more reason to ask the question that you haven't answered yet regarding your apparent desire to spread disinformation, whether it be willfully or otherwise.

 

And the point you are trying to make with posts #191 - #193 is what precisely?

 

What disinformation am I spreading?

 

London has the HQ of more international corporations than any city in the world - big organisations do a lot of scenario planning - they have to keep business continuity.

 

Given that it isn't exactly unlikely that a large company would be running an exercise on 7/7.

 

Hill / Muad'Dib (and mosy conspiracy theorists) have never worked for large organisations - therefore they'd easily think it suspicious - it isn't - it is the real world whether or not we like it.

[vResistance]

Make it down to the platform in under 3 minutes carrying heavy backpacks full of EXTREMELY volatile "home-made" explosives?

 

 

To accept your ridiculous idea we would need to completely ignore the following:

 

 

1) there is no evidence they purchased the tickets in advance;

 

2) if they were planning on catching the 7:24A train from Luton it is HIGHLY unlikely that they would show up with less than 2 minutes to spare, especially considering we have been told they had been sitting out in the parking area for quite some time;

 

3) no matter how "fit" they may have been there is absolutely no way they could have ran or even walked rapidly...if we are to believe the official story that they were carrying EXTREMELY volatile "home-made" explosives made in their bathtubs; and

 

4) you can bet if they did catch the 7:24A that left Luton station at 7:25A there would be LOADS of CCTV camera footage of them catching the tube trains that they supposedly blew up.

 

 

Any way you want to try it, the official story just doesn't add up.

 

I can't really comment on if they could of made it in time,i don't know the area or how possible it would be.

However considering they were wearing these volatile backpacks they seemed very relaxed just prior to the bombings according to witness reports,didn't one even call for a macdonalds(sounds like a real hardcore terrorist:suspect:)