vResistance

Yet an unmanned rocket of the same design had exploded on lift off weeks before. He raised concerns about this in the documentary. There's a very real chance if it going horribly wrong.

I don't doubt it once you've reached speed and altitude, I understand that but the rocket was accelerating to over 4700 mph

I can see a page flapping slightly as if in a light breeze. More the point what is he doing? Writing on the pad while accelerating into space. Any ideas what they might be writing anyway? seems a strange thing to be expected to do at such a once in a lifetime, death defying moment.

I think In the first video in op, it shows inside the cabin at about 20sec, Looks like he's penning his Christmas list.

Thanks for your input everybody. I take everything on board about the velocity and camera shake etc , i'd considered it anyway.camera shake technology does reduce shake but wouldn't eliminate it altogether, and anyway if you look at the pad of paper in the his hand you can see they're not been shaken about at all. Do you really believe those first few seconds and minutes of the launch could be so smooth, with no sign of motion in the cabin apart from the gently swaying thing. Or is it that to accept it doesn't make sense challenges your world view, a display of cognitive dissonance? Why fake this? someone asked. Usually in these cases it's best to follow the money. Where did the funding come from for this project? http://www.space.com/24914-nasa-2015-budget-request-revealed.html "NASA's 2015 budget would remain essentially flat at $17.5 billion under a White House spending proposal unveiled today (March 4) that would hold the line on the agency's biggest space programs while laying the groundwork for major new astrophysics and planetary science missions." 17.5 Billion is quite an incentive. Jeez, to think what good could be done with that.

But they were sat like that throughout the launch accerating from zero to over 4700 mph

I'm just saying it doesn't appear Tim Peake was sat in the rocket that we saw being launched. If that's the case then why assume anything went into space. Thanks, If you watch the second video in the OP, you get a pretty clear view, the astronauts appear to be under. no stresses whatsoever

Will do, cheers. Very funny so gforce and vibration are all a conspiracy theory.

I watched the live launch on 'This Morning" (my wife watches it) when they cut back to the studio, the look of bewilderment on Phil and Holly's face was a picture. Maybe like me they'd noticed the two astronauts were obviously not experiencing the G forces expected if sat in a rocket hurtling into space and no sign of vibration seen on the internal camera. The two are sat effortlessly writing notes throughout the launch, on the live feed Tim lifts his head, smiles and waves to camera when according to the commentary they are travelling at over 4700 mph. I've since seen a clip from ch4 news where they claimed he made the gesture when he was no longer under velocity, but that conflicts with what was shown in the live launch. Last night I watched a documentary on BBC iPlayer about Tim's "journey" to becoming an astronaut, in that they discuss G force on reentry but not on take off, one previous visitor to the ISS does mention the vibration on take off though. In short I'm saying it would be impossible to sit and write notes so effortlessly if at all during a rocket launch. With G force, vibration, adrenaline, the instinct to cling on for dear life. I'm sure if Tim is in space, he didn't go in that rocket. Launch video. This one he does the headlift and wave at around 4.10 and the speed is stated as over 4700 mph

While there is little direct evidence of guilt, there is plenty that points to the brothers being set up as patsies https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/justice-denied-examining-the-evidence-that-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-was-a-patsy-in-boston-bombing/

Some more recent articles http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/health/marijuana-kills-cancer-cells-says-us-governmentfunded-research-31131979.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-32020114

There's been some more encouraging news and success stories come out recently. 'Those treated with both radiation and the cannabinoids saw the most beneficial results and a drastic reduction in size." Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2837774/How-CANNABIS-treat-cancer-Study-finds-compound-plant-help-shrink-brain-aggressive-brain-tumours.html#ixzz3K5ziq8Fc Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Jo Mathews testimony http://cannabis-cancer-info.org/2014/11/20/mama-jos-testimonial-nov-14/

What do you have in mind?

http://rt.com/usa/182980-us-spy-flights-syria/ "syria is ready to cooperate and coordinate ... at the regional and international level in the war on terror,” Muallem was quoted by Fars as saying. “But any efforts to combat terrorism should come in coordination with the Syrian government.” But US officials said they did not plan to coordinate with Damascus on targeting IS militants in Syria “There are no plans to coordinate with the Assad regime as we consider this terror threat,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said in Washington on Tuesday." ---------- Post added 27-08-2014 at 14:03 ---------- Your memory isn't that good then. As you know we're not allowed to discuss the subject so I'm not even wasting my breath.

Telling lies about me now i have never held those beliefs, as usual you misquote and twist what I have said about 7/7. Take your trolling elsewhere you lying scumbag.

We'll see if it's a pie in the sky theory or not in the coming months.

As I say it's weird, it makes no sense to me why ISIS, or if it's a 'false flag' those that staged it would do that. ISIS getting more fancy? Hmmmm, seems a bit daft to go to all that trouble not to behead someone and do it later off camera. Seems to me its you clutching at straws there, but its something to consider.

The questions are directed at anybody reading the thread. In response to the post I quoted. Anyway, you ask "You really think that the British or American's cannot create a believable video? " Depends what you mean by the British and Americans. I'm sure there are people could've done a more convincing job yes. Depends what they have at their disposal. The weird thing is, why would anyone over egg the video with different camera angles, clip on microphones and fancy editing when it would've been far easier and more convincing just to use a camera phone.? Its more something you'd see in TV programs or films.

How about answering my questions.

The part of the video that shows a corpse is actually a still photo that the video pans across. Why would they not just video the body? They went to extra trouble to edit in this photo, another unnecessary use of editing equipment. In light of the video turning out to be staged, you'd have to wonder whether the photo of the corpse is genuine. There is analasys of the picture to be found online that claims to prove it is photoshopped. ---------- Post added 27-08-2014 at 08:56 ---------- The camera never lies?

"how does a beheading garner support for bombing the Assad regime?" It garners support for bombing the ISIS regime in Syria. Once that starts then they wont stop there, they only have to claim Assad is making life difficult in doing the job then he'll be the new target , It'll turn into all out war. I'm telling you, a few weeks or months from now you'll see it happen. Its as predictable as a TV soap story line.

It became clear a few days ago, i was listening to BBC news on radio. Early on they were talking about putting aside differences with Assad and work with him in fighting ISIS in Syria where they have gained a strong base. Very good I thought, they've seen sense at last, its what I said they should be doing when instead 'we' were arming and training the militants fighting Assad's army. A little later though they were talking of attacking Syria anyway without agreements from Assad. What I'm saying, following the failure to get support for war with Syria before, this is plan b. They won't stop at ISIS you see, they'll take down the Assad regime and install a west friendly Muppet. The beheading video was meant to be the game changer.

Who was it mentioned shock and awe? I think it was produced for propaganda purposes but not for IS. More like US.

What convincing evidence? A staged execution? When someone pretends to kill someone and someone pretends they are being killed, staged is more accurate. It is also the word used by the experts.

So that's all it takes, someone to say he probably is? Somebody that knows no more than you and I ?He might be, he might not. That's what probably means. There is as yet no evidence he's dead.