petemcewan   27 #169 Posted January 21, 2018 Learn climate science from the Met Office. Good stuff.  Learning to read a "Surface Pressure Chart " is a good start. https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate-guide Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
MAC33 Â Â 10 #170 Posted January 21, 2018 Pete,I can also 'learn' from NIST regarding what took place on 911. Â Trouble is,it's a stack of lies..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
El Cid   221 #171 Posted January 21, 2018 Pete,I can also 'learn' from NIST regarding what took place on 911. Trouble is,it's a stack of lies.....  So you believe the Met Office tell "a stack of lies", a little like Donald Trump? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
barleycorn   10 #172 Posted January 21, 2018 Pete,I can also 'learn' from NIST regarding what took place on 911. Trouble is,it's a stack of lies..... On a flat earth did the towers fall at freefall speed... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Obelix   11 #173 Posted January 21, 2018 Pete,I can also 'learn' from NIST regarding what took place on 911. Trouble is,it's a stack of lies.....  Here we go another conspiracy theory shall be born with not the slightest shred of evidence beyond Youtube.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
MAC33 Â Â 10 #174 Posted January 21, 2018 NIST.... the Govt Department tasked with finding out what went on that day. Â Their story is exactly that,a wild theory that seemingly the majority of the flock have gulped down. Â But the met office wouldn't fudge the figures.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Obelix   11 #175 Posted January 21, 2018 Neither would NIST.  You are barking up the wrong tree if you think you are convincing anyone by trying to like climate change and 911 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
El Cid   221 #176 Posted January 21, 2018 But the met office wouldn't fudge the figures....  There are more organisations than the Met Office that study the climate. They dont all agree 100%.   2017 was the second-hottest year, behind only 2016, according to NASA, which pegs the world’s average temperatures at 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean. But according to NOAA, 2017 was the third warmest on record, behind 2016 and 2015. The two government agencies ranked 2017 differently because they use slightly different methods to calculate world temperatures.  https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/18/16905048/2017-hottest-year-climate-change-trends-nasa-noaa Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
El Cid   221 #177 Posted June 13, 2018 Still rising.  Antarctica loses three trillion tonnes of ice in 25 years  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-44470208# Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
El Cid   221 #178 Posted June 14, 2018 Maybe. If you read the paper that is the basis of the article, you will see that there are extremely large possible variations in the estimates used.  Global sea level has been rising over the past century, and the rate has increased in recent decades. In 2014, global sea level was 2.6 inches above the 1993 average—the highest annual average in the satellite record (1993-present). Sea level continues to rise at a rate of about one-eighth of an inch per year.  https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/  https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
