Mother wants to have a baby WITH her son.

[Solomon1]

A mother who reunited with the son she gave up for adoption 30 years ago says that now they’re in love and they are trying for a baby together.

 

Kim West, 51, has been in a relationship with her biological son Ben Ford, 32, for two years and believe they are ‘meant to be together’ after she had to give him up for adoption a week after he was born.

 

Despite the critics, the couple are planning to get married, insist their relationship is not incest, the “New Day” paper reports.

 

Kinda gross

 

But apparently a natural tendency

 

http://phys.org/news/2010-07-sexual-resemble-parents.html

[*_ash_*]

Kinda gross

 

 

Obviously.

 

 

But apparently a natural tendency

 

http://phys.org/news/2010-07-sexual-resemble-parents.html

 

You really have an odd way of linking things in your head.

Edited April 12, 2016 by *_ash_*

[Jerky]

If you go to Barnsley then you can do this, its quite common round that way

[Solomon1]

You really have an odd way of linking things in your head

 

You mean with logic and facts?

 

Yeah, not everyone has this gift

 

"The results of this experiment were that those who were exposed to a picture of their parent generally found the stranger's face more sexually attractive than those who were shown the photo of an unrelated person"

[*_ash_*]

You mean with logic and facts?

 

Yeah, not everyone has this gift

 

"The results of this experiment were that those who were exposed to a picture of their parent generally found the stranger's face more sexually attractive than those who were shown the photo of an unrelated person"

 

just bizarre.

[runningman1]

just bizarre.

 

What was bizarre about his comment that provided evidence?

[RootsBooster]

I find myself in two minds about this story.

 

A friend of mine is an adherent of a certain Abrahamic religion and therefore despises gays. He thinks they are an abomination and says he would kill them if he could get away with it.

 

I argue that he is an idiot and whatever goes on between two consenting adults behind closed doors is no one else's business.

 

Does this apply here?

 

I would say "whatever goes on between two consenting adults behind closed doors is no one else's business, as long as it doesn't have negative effects on someone else".

 

So if they're wanting a child together, the latter part of that statement applies.

[runningman1]

I would say "whatever goes on between two consenting adults behind closed doors is no one else's business, as long as it doesn't have negative effects on someone else".

 

So if they're wanting a child together, the latter part of that statement applies.

 

That was my original response, but I don't think it is as easy as that. Take homosexual, or mixed race relationships, they offend some people. Therefore they have negative effects on others, who actually probably can't help how they feel.

 

A less contraversial example would be those with certain diseases. Should, for example, those with HIV be prohibited from sexual intercourse?

[RootsBooster]

That was my original response, but I don't think it is as easy as that. Take homosexual, or mixed race relationships, they offend some people. Therefore they have negative effects on others, who actually probably can't help how they feel.

 

A less contraversial example would be those with certain diseases. Should, for example, those with HIV be prohibited from sexual intercourse?

 

I'm not talking about offending others' sense of morality I'm talking about physical harm.

[dan90]

Jesus Christ and wen you think you have heard it all that jumps up and hits you in face