Bypassblade Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 But they still voted for her. Odd how someone as unpopular as you seem to think had so much support that she could win 3 election, and yet when Scargill stood for parliament he lost his deposit. :hihi: Â Tony Blair won 3 elections so what, she was still an evil bitch just intent on making the rich, richer and down treading the lower classes. Just ask little kids now grown up, how they miss their daddy as as a result of her policies, either a miner or shop keeper who took his own life. Â Tony Blair just stood down as he'd had enough & stupidly this gave the job to Gordon the Gopher. Â She was kicked out and stabbed in the back by her party, quicker than Julius Caesar as she was a liability. Â Lets face facts Nick Clegg is on record as saying they only struck a coalition with smarmy Dave, as Gordon Brown was the leader of Labour, anyone else they'd have sided with Labour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caparo Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Tony Blair won 3 elections so what, she was still an evil bitch just intent on making the rich, richer and down treading the lower classes. Just ask little kids now grown up, how they miss their daddy as as a result of her policies, either a miner or shop keeper who took his own life. Tony Blair just stood down as he'd had enough & stupidly this gave the job to Gordon the Gopher.  She was kicked out and stabbed in the back by her party, quicker than Julius Caesar as she was a liability.  Lets face facts Nick Clegg is on record as saying they only struck a coalition with smarmy Dave, as Gordon Brown was the leader of Labour, anyone else they'd have sided with Labour.  Once again you mix up your opinion with popular opinion. It is interesting that you should point out that Blair won 3 elections too. Many on here would claim that Blair was a Tory anyhow. Just how many leaders has the Labour Party had apart from Blair who has won a general election in the last 50 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bypassblade Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Once again you mix up your opinion with popular opinion. It is interesting that you should point out that Blair won 3 elections too. Many on here would claim that Blair was a Tory anyhow. Just how many leaders has the Labour Party had apart from Blair who has won a general election in the last 50 years?  I'd have to look, but their not the argument you're just sidetracking Thatcher is the subject, I didn't like Blair and just so sad we lost John Smith as he would have been possibly the greatest post war PM of any party.  It's not my opinion its fact she was stabbed in the back, and Clegg said that statement. So anyway no going to argue with you, I'm tired so going to rest now, you be happy you seem a nice enough person.  I said person as unsure if male or female, and made that mistake far too often  Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manlinose Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Just how many leaders has the Labour Party had apart from Blair who has won a general election in the last 50 years?  in numbers of leaders (excluding Thatcher and Blair) who have won elections in the last 50 years, Labour has one - Harold Wilson won three elections - and the Conservatives have two -Edward Heath and John Major won one each  In addition Wilson also led a minority Government as does David Cameron  hope that helps  winning elections doesn't mean you are more popular than unpopular it just means you have a majority of the seats in a non-proportional election system Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caparo Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 in numbers of leaders (excluding Thatcher and Blair) who have won elections in the last 50 years, Labour has one - Harold Wilson won three elections - and the Conservatives have two -Edward Heath and John Major won one each In addition Wilson also led a minority Government as does David Cameron  hope that helps  winning elections doesn't mean you are more popular than unpopular it just means you have a majority of the seats in a non-proportional election system  You need to be popular for folks to vote for your party. Hence Labour would be several points higher with the other Miliband in charge. Similarly Michael Foot only appealed to a very limited audience and would never have led Labour to victory in 100 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manlinose Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 You need to be popular for folks to vote for your party. Hence Labour would be several points higher with the other Miliband in charge. Similarly Michael Foot only appealed to a very limited audience and would never have led Labour to victory in 100 years.  true to some extent  you can be unpopular and win elections - most prime ministers do - you just need to appeal to enough people - not a majority - all it means is that you are popular with some people  agree with the Foot comment though - he was a decent bloke, but never stood a chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister M Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Goodbye Mrs T… Though we all knew you too well You never had the grace to admit You could be wrong about it all England’s saviour they called you But the huge cost was to us all You set us all on a treadmill Made us the market’s slaves all  And it seems to me you lived your life Blowing at the candle in the wind Never allowing any shelter When the rain set in I wish I’d never known you But I was just a child And you seemed to live on and on And the myth is ever wild Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wednesday1 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 This can't be true, if it were she would have a lot less support than she appears to have. Â Â If she was as revered as some on here appear to think why then is Smarmy Dave trying to 'detoxify' the Tory party? Â Could it have something to do with the fact that at the last election his party missed the biggest open goal in political history, due to the fact that enough people remembered the Witches' policies to deny them a majority (without the assistance of the ever dutiful Lib Dems). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bypassblade Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 You need to be popular for folks to vote for your party. Hence Labour would be several points higher with the other Miliband in charge. Similarly Michael Foot only appealed to a very limited audience and would never have led Labour to victory in 100 years. Â Oh yes & William Hague was the epitome of greatness, and it speaks volumes about Major when he was giving Edwina Currie one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernStar Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Words fail me when it comes to that party political circus for that hateful, vile, venomous, ruinous, snob, bigot, selfish and ignorant excuse for humanity. Â Â Hope that's an end to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now