Jump to content

"Excessive Drinking the scandal of our Society"


Recommended Posts

Thats what David Cameron has said.

Do you think he is right to want to tackle the problem of excessive drinking? which is apparently getting much worse.

Its said to cost the NHS 2.5 billion a year.We have all seen the pictures on our tv screens of what the Town centres are like at the weekends,and A&E departments filled with abusive drunks.Then there are all the crimes associated with alcohol abuse.Yet in todays culture it seems be considered perfectly acceptable to drink excessively instead of moderately.

Most of us like to have a few drinks on a social occasion,or the odd glass or two at home..nothing wrong with that,and we've all been young once!

Isn't time though to take the whole matter more seriously and encourage more responsibility instead of turning a blind eye to it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes why is it that Brits seem to have this problem of binge drinking , an American reporter was in London covering the wedding last year (Anderson Cooper) he left his hotel room at 11pm went outside as the pubs were turning out, he said people were just throwing up and urinating on the side walks like it was nothing...maybe it's just London at 11pm :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's alright for Cameron and the rest of the MPs telling us that there will be minimum pricing while they still get their subsidised bar and restaurant, hypocrites. He is just using it as an excuse to increase prices for everyone and rake in more money. Why should people who like the occasional drink have to pay for the idiots that just go and get drunk. Would make far more sense to charge people who have to be taken to hospital because they are too drunk, a minimum of £100.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's alright for Cameron and the rest of the MPs telling us that there will be minimum pricing while they still get their subsidised bar and restaurant, hypocrites. He is just using it as an excuse to increase prices for everyone and rake in more money. Why should people who like the occasional drink have to pay for the idiots that just go and get drunk. Would make far more sense to charge people who have to be taken to hospital because they are too drunk, a minimum of £100.

 

the minimum price which is usually bandied about is 50p per unit or around £1 a pint which will make not a jot of difference to the average beer drinker. it might have a bigger impact on spirits.

 

hopefully, it will end the practice of supermarkets selling cheap beer which might boost the pub trade a bit which would be very good :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... Would make far more sense to charge people who have to be taken to hospital because they are too drunk, a minimum of £100.

 

 

But what about health care being 'free at the point of provision'?

 

Perhaps everybody should be obliged to obtain medical insurance (through a state-run scheme or from a private company) and everybody should be given a bill which they would take to their insurers?

 

It's either 'free at the point of provision' or 'everybody gets a bill'. You can't have it both ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's alright for Cameron and the rest of the MPs telling us that there will be minimum pricing while they still get their subsidised bar and restaurant, hypocrites.

 

There are 11 bars and pubs in the PALACE OF WESTMINSTER. More restaurants, serving economy alcohol. According to the politicians, only the rich should have access to subsidised alcohol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But what about health care being 'free at the point of provision'?

 

Perhaps everybody should be obliged to obtain medical insurance (through a state-run scheme or from a private company) and everybody should be given a bill which they would take to their insurers?

 

It's either 'free at the point of provision' or 'everybody gets a bill'. You can't have it both ways.

 

Insurers would not cover self-inflicted injuries, so that would amount to exactly the policy that iansheff is suggesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.