carosio Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Since reading these posts it's become apparent to me why the police don't like tinted car windows! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hsb98c Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 if I was trolling I'd post something inflammatory, then sit back and watch. Some of the highlights so far (in this thread, not looking at the ATM one...): No. Who died and put you in charge? The old, if you've got nothing to hide, argument. Invasion of privacy should be justified, not the other way around. It involves more than ANPR now? The one I like best is here: The priority seems to be to rubbish anyones concerns about privacy Where is the evidence to support this? Planner1 is answering some questions on the system (more importantly letting us know what they are for) but I haven't seen any facts. Have you, or is this all hot air blowing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MR BENN Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 who`s betting that once the busiest routes are established through these cameras- the council decide to stick up some speed cameras where the most cash will be made Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planner1 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 The priority instead seems to be to rubbish anyones concerns about privacy though. No one is rubbishing concerns. I do not share them. What is being done is perfectly legal, open and above board. It's being implemented with the aim of making improvements for the travelling public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planner1 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 who`s betting that once the busiest routes are established through these cameras- the council decide to stick up some speed cameras where the most cash will be made Your paranoia seems to have no end! Do you seriously think that the Council don't know what the "busiest" routes are already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willowl Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 I think it's great, the more people it can catch who don't pay car tax and insurance the better.!!! Someone I know was hit by an uninsured driver and lost big time. Bloody scrubbers!! If you cant afford a car with tax and insurance get the bl**dy bus! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MR BENN Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 Your paranoia seems to have no end! Do you seriously think that the Council don't know what the "busiest" routes are already? in which case ,why the need for these cameras ? by your own admission the council already know the busiest routes. it seems to me these cameras are spy cameras dressed up as data collectors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willowl Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 of course they're data collectors! it's not even a topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planner1 Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 in which case ,why the need for these cameras ? by your own admission the council already know the busiest routes. it seems to me these cameras are spy cameras dressed up as data collectors. Try reading the thread, I've explained it enough times! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spritulist Posted April 24, 2009 Share Posted April 24, 2009 ufo camera..for speeding space ships Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now