stressed_mum Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 Why can't the british justice system take a leaf from this mans book????? http://www.cnn.com/US/9907/27/tough.sheriff/ & send them there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielle1 Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 rob is 44 not 54 the paper got his age wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hillsbro Posted June 16, 2008 Share Posted June 16, 2008 rob is 44 not 54 the paper got his age wrong I guess that means the b*stard will live ten years longer than we'd thought. I'd like to think that all of them will be in jail, but we know how soft our penal system is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pink fairy Posted June 18, 2008 Share Posted June 18, 2008 I am gobsacked reading this ,its horrible. None ones to blame but parents. Why there not being charged with murder is beyond belief. Surely see would no what she was doing to this poor child would result in death. I am shell shocked i dont know what to say. RIP tiffany may the angels give you the love, warmth and protection you deserve and may you now be at peace . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinkabel Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 you cant blame the parents they didnt ask for this :( how would you feel if your child did something and you (as you would) protect them and everyone had a go at you ?? its down to the offender simple as they did the crime no one else They have welcomed these evil animals into their home now, that says a lot about them!! I'm only having a go at the grandparents because they are now giving them a roof over their heads, no way would my mum do this for me and no way would i do it for my children! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In Uppers Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 Just to add a little bit more to this, the reasons for starving Tiffany certainly weren't because they couldn't afford to as they bought a DOG on the Sunday before for a GRAND !!!!!!!! In addition to this, he bought her a spaniel for her 21st birthday for £500 !! and they already had a Rottweiller. The sodding dogs didn't starve - how's that eh!!!!???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irenewilde Posted June 20, 2008 Share Posted June 20, 2008 Just to add a little bit more to this, the reasons for starving Tiffany certainly weren't because they couldn't afford to as they bought a DOG on the Sunday before for a GRAND !!!!!!!! In addition to this, he bought her a spaniel for her 21st birthday for £500 !! and they already had a Rottweiller. The sodding dogs didn't starve - how's that eh!!!!???? They didn't starve but they were found in a room full of faeces and urine. I'm not in any way saying that's as bad as what happened to that poor child but it seems those folks didn't care about anything but themselves...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielle1 Posted June 21, 2008 Share Posted June 21, 2008 Why is it that if someone thinks an animal is being mistreated they're on the phone like a shot to the RSPCA (as they should) but are more reluctant to report suspicions of child abuse or neglect? this is cos when u report anything to social services they do follow (some cases) it up but they can only take it further if they have a name and address for the person reporting it if the person wont give a name and they find the reported incident to be true they cant use it in court as it cant be used as evidence (as told by a former social worker/friend) (very bad system if u ask me) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiamondGirl Posted June 21, 2008 Share Posted June 21, 2008 Why is it that if someone thinks an animal is being mistreated they're on the phone like a shot to the RSPCA (as they should) but are more reluctant to report suspicions of child abuse or neglect? this is cos when u report anything to social services they do follow (some cases) it up but they can only take it further if they have a name and address for the person reporting it if the person wont give a name and they find the reported incident to be true they cant use it in court as it cant be used as evidence (as told by a former social worker/friend) (very bad system if u ask me) I hope if you know these people when you next see them you spit on them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In Uppers Posted June 22, 2008 Share Posted June 22, 2008 I'd do more than that Diamondgirl - did you mean spit or sht? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts