foxforcefive   10 #13 Posted April 17, 2008 i would have thought that at a public event where there are celebrities about, it is fairly obvious that there will be people taking pictures  It would be more obvious if there was a public notice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
R.A.N.D Â Â 10 #14 Posted April 17, 2008 just another load of crap for you all to moan about get a grip. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
samesame monkey   10 #15 Posted April 17, 2008 One of the main reasons I concentrate on landscapes and still life. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Venables   10 #16 Posted April 17, 2008 What a load of crap. Do the BBC ask for a parents permission when you get a close up of some smiley cheery kids face on MOTD? No. Are the parents bothered? No.  Countrys gone mad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Rich   12 #17 Posted April 17, 2008 I was on a photography course a few years back, and during the course one day I decided to take a photo of the Tram as it left the Cathedral, you know, local detail and all, unfortunately this old bloke got in the shot, and came up to me very agressively and threatened to shove the camera somewhere very personal, very painfully!  I told him I was a photography student and was taking a shot of the Tram, and it wasn't my fault he got in the shot! He just walked off in a huff! Phew! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
prioryx   10 #18 Posted April 17, 2008 What about them? Those don't get published, and nobody makes money out of them. They're for security purposes only.  I suppose if you want to take a photo of your family on holiday you ask everyone around to move out of the way, or do you walk on the beach and warn everyone that you are about to take a photo. If they do mind will they turn away so that they will not be recognized or do you not take the photo. What about just looking at people do you want that to be made illegal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
bagger   10 #19 Posted April 17, 2008 Photographers are mounting a campaign to try to stop people overeacting to them taking snaps in public. From the BBC   I think it was probably because Letitia Dean doesn't want HER photo being taken. I'm sure no one thought the photographer concerned was a paedophile. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
pennypie   10 #20 Posted April 17, 2008 I think it was probably because Letitia Dean doesn't want HER photo being taken. I'm sure no one thought the photographer concerned was a paedophile.  In which case, why was she doing a public appearance? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Eric_Collins   11 #21 Posted April 17, 2008 how long will it be before the peace gardens is mentioned ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Squiggs   11 #22 Posted April 17, 2008 how long will it be before the peace gardens is mentioned ?   Hmm...I'd guess at 17-04-2008, 08:52 PM Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
foxforcefive   10 #23 Posted April 17, 2008 Good guess squiggs, exactly right:thumbsup: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Googleberry   10 #24 Posted April 17, 2008 What about them? Those don't get published, and nobody makes money out of them. They're for security purposes only.Err... http://www.thepcoffice.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=24&Itemid=29 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...