Jump to content

Wikipedia Votes to Ban Daily Mail

Recommended Posts

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website?CMP=twt_a-media_b-gdnmedia

 

Wikipedia editors have voted to ban the Daily Mail as a source for the website in all but exceptional circumstances after deeming the news group “generally unreliable”.

 

The editors described the arguments for a ban as “centred on the Daily Mail’s reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism and flat-out fabrication”.

 

funnily enough they also bring up Russia Today, and Fox News for raising concerns with Editors, gonna ruffle a few right wing feathers :hihi:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When Facebook started started flagging links people post that have failed independent fact checking the Mail's response was to run a character assassination article on a person who runs one of the fact checking sites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When Facebook started started flagging links people post that have failed independent fact checking the Mail's response was to run a character assassination article on a person who runs one of the fact checking sites.

sounds a bit like somebody whos just been made president :suspect::huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news! If only Mail readers realised how brainwashed they can become by it. We could take back control and run the country properly.

 

When Facebook started started flagging links people post that have failed independent fact checking the Mail's response was to run a character assassination article on a person who runs one of the fact checking sites.

 

That's standard operating practice for the Mail and their ilk.

 

Fox News is the worst, they're just the propaganda arm of the Republican Party. I watched the

documentary about how they do it - it's a real eye-opener!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great news! If only Mail readers realised how brainwashed they can become by it. We could take back control and run the country properly.

 

 

 

That's standard operating practice for the Mail and their ilk.

 

Fox News is the worst, they're just the propaganda arm of the Republican Party. I watched the

documentary about how they do it - it's a real eye-opener!

 

God help the US President if they edited Twitter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well, it'll confirm the paranoid delusions of those who work at the Daily Wail (Melanie Philips, Jan Moir, and the ever hateful Richard Littlecock). Ironic that Wikipedia, of all organisations, thinks that the Mail is unreliable. ha ha ha

Edited by Mister M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

.."it's immie grantssss faaaulllttt!!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How deeply ironic this is. One of the first things academics tell their students is not to rely on Wikipedia as a source of information. Perhaps Wiki is attempting to make the site a 'safe space' for today's student snowflakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.