melthebell 864 #1 Posted February 8, 2017 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website?CMP=twt_a-media_b-gdnmedia Wikipedia editors have voted to ban the Daily Mail as a source for the website in all but exceptional circumstances after deeming the news group “generally unreliable”. The editors described the arguments for a ban as “centred on the Daily Mail’s reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism and flat-out fabrication”. funnily enough they also bring up Russia Today, and Fox News for raising concerns with Editors, gonna ruffle a few right wing feathers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
unbeliever 10 #2 Posted February 8, 2017 This is jolly funny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
altus 540 #3 Posted February 8, 2017 When Facebook started started flagging links people post that have failed independent fact checking the Mail's response was to run a character assassination article on a person who runs one of the fact checking sites. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
melthebell 864 #4 Posted February 8, 2017 When Facebook started started flagging links people post that have failed independent fact checking the Mail's response was to run a character assassination article on a person who runs one of the fact checking sites. sounds a bit like somebody whos just been made president Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Robin-H 11 #5 Posted February 8, 2017 And 'The US Government's House Committee on Science' still has an article (which has already been debunked) from the Daily Mail as their lead as of today. https://science.house.gov/news/in-the-news/exposed-how-world-leaders-were-duped-investing-billions-over-manipulated-global Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Flexo 10 #6 Posted February 8, 2017 Great news! If only Mail readers realised how brainwashed they can become by it. We could take back control and run the country properly. When Facebook started started flagging links people post that have failed independent fact checking the Mail's response was to run a character assassination article on a person who runs one of the fact checking sites. That's standard operating practice for the Mail and their ilk. Fox News is the worst, they're just the propaganda arm of the Republican Party. I watched the documentary about how they do it - it's a real eye-opener! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
TORONTONY 10 #7 Posted February 8, 2017 Great news! If only Mail readers realised how brainwashed they can become by it. We could take back control and run the country properly. That's standard operating practice for the Mail and their ilk. Fox News is the worst, they're just the propaganda arm of the Republican Party. I watched the documentary about how they do it - it's a real eye-opener! God help the US President if they edited Twitter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mister M 1,627 #8 Posted February 8, 2017 (edited) Oh well, it'll confirm the paranoid delusions of those who work at the Daily Wail (Melanie Philips, Jan Moir, and the ever hateful Richard Littlecock). Ironic that Wikipedia, of all organisations, thinks that the Mail is unreliable. ha ha ha Edited February 8, 2017 by Mister M Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
tzijlstra 11 #9 Posted February 9, 2017 'Commie website bans free speech!' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Guest #10 Posted February 9, 2017 .."it's immie grantssss faaaulllttt!!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
whiteowl 54 #11 Posted February 9, 2017 Wikipedia gives you cancer #alternativefacts Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
NigelFargate 10 #12 Posted February 9, 2017 How deeply ironic this is. One of the first things academics tell their students is not to rely on Wikipedia as a source of information. Perhaps Wiki is attempting to make the site a 'safe space' for today's student snowflakes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...