s2 blade

Whats more sad you or the "milkshake thief" ? .... You

The poisoned chalice for us is just being involved in the play-offs

They have no evidence ...... Because there is none .

Just like certain people won't accept that nutcases in the name of Islam are to blame for the death of Lee Rigby , Thousands on 9/11 , July the 7th , Boston bombings etc etc

It's of little surprise people in mediocre jobs already are turning us down , it has to be 1 of the worst jobs in the football league , with the worse board supposedly backing you .

Or you could all just pay the measly £15 this fight more than deserved and watch it in perfect hd on your t.v

Funny how the sympathisers have nothing to say on this matter . Utterly disgusting and I'd throw away the key .

You wrote it ! Not me

First sentence "as your won"

But because there is no credit to who used or created the expression you are passing at your own work ! By your logic that is .

It's an observation of someone looking like caveman I believe

As your won , that would be as your own I take it . Your very sig is someone else work with no mention of the origin .

Knuckle dragging EDL ..... Stereo typing a group of people on appearance ... Isn't that wrong ?

Hardly nicked is it . Copy and paste isn't actually a crime , unless its pat condell then it's removed on your behalf !

What you mean like when anyone quotes pat condell and is instantly told to remove it !

As someone who has been publicly pilloried and demonized by lefties for pointing out (in private) that the Koran plainly does advocate these things like murder , I must agree . The Koran says many times that stubborn kaffirs who refuse to convert must be killed. It also says that kaffir women and girls may be used as concubines by the faithful. Then it tells lefties to lie about it. Oh sorry, no, the lefties invented that bit.

Or this " this machine ignores the problem"

Because I'm not racist , as you well know !

The truth is that those who hacked away at a British soldier yesterday are acting in accordance with a theologically determined logic which can certainly be situated within a sharia view of Islamic culture and understood on the basis of Islamic religious precepts. The killer calmly and rationally quoted Islamic sacred texts: 'We must fight them as they fight us' echoes the Qur'an: "..fight (qātilū - literally means kill) in the cause of Allah those who fight you... And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for fitnah (oppression, persecution) is worse than slaughter;... if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith'" (Sura 2:190-9). "..fight the polytheists all together as they fight you all together" (Sura 9:36). "Permission to fight is given to those who are fought against, because they have been wronged and surely, Allah is able to give them victory" (Sura 22:39). The reference 'an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth' is the Mosaic Pentateuch reiterated in the Qur'an: "And We prescribed for them therein: The life for the life, and the eye for the eye, and the nose for the nose, and the ear for the ear, and the tooth for the tooth, and for wounds retaliation" (Sura 5:54). These murderers invoke ancient religious rulings and refute any notion of abrogation. As Osama Bin Laden put it: "It is commanded by our religion and intellect that the oppressed have a right to return the aggression. Do not await anything from us but Jihad, resistance and revenge." No moderate or reasonable Muslim would invoke the literal interpretation of such texts today. But it is simply not true to say that this interpretation of Jihad has no basis in Islam. The Woolwich slaughter is a declared reprisal attack which comes as a direct consequence of the British military presence in Iraq, Libya or Afghanistan. It is, to the jihadi mind, a rational act of holy war, of the sort advocated today by the die-hard Salafist-Wahhabi movement. That is not to say that the Woolwich killers are members of this school or adherents of its teachings. This is simply to refute the crass and simplistic assertion by the MCB that this slaughter 'has no basis in Islam'. In fact, it bears all the hallmarks of the sort of ritualistic killing not infrequently featured in the Qur'an and Ahadith. This is not, of course, to excuse or justify the action, but we get nowhere very quickly at all if the official body which purports to represent all British Muslims denies the religio-political or theo-cultural inspiration of the slaughter.

I know something he is against ... Answering certain questions

Only a fool would think the EDL are an answer to anything ! A set of losers . But also only a fool would think that yesterday's attack was anything other than a direct attack on British people committed in the name of Islam !

I don't support the EDL and think the way they conduct themselves at times is disgusting and uneducated , however I do share the same views as them on many subjects regarding militant Islam , not every "racist" as you would call me is a "scumbag" as you would also call me .

And if you want to know what goes in the warped mind of militant Islam see all today's newspapers news channels news feeds etc etc .

What are your views on the two men who committed yesterday's savage attack then ? If your views on the Edl are that strong surely your views on the Islamic loony butchers from yesterday must be far stronger .

If its people like yesterday's attackers who cares if they die ?