Jump to content

No Orgreave inquiry


Recommended Posts

It's the right decision. The miners came looking for a confrontation and got one, if there had been no pickets there would have been no "battle". The police were only protecting themselves and local communities.

 

Ahh of course you know the BBC showed the miners throwing stones at the police and then the police charging at them right? Did you know that wasn't the order it actually happened in?

 

---------- Post added 31-10-2016 at 15:38 ----------

 

Who is Lesley boulton?

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/staticarchive/96988dea674d4961b3e5d471c05469913a45472e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Presumably the one in the photo that gets bandied about out of context when she's confronted by a mounted officer.

 

Out of context huh? Like the BBC showing the miners throwing stones before the police charge even though the stone throwing followed the police charge?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh of course you know the BBC showed the miners throwing stones at the police and then the police charging at them right? Did you know that wasn't the order it actually happened in

 

Irrelevant. Miners turned up looking for a scrap. That's contrary to public order act 1936. If you were in that association you were commiting an offence. You didn't have to be a miner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of context huh? Like the BBC showing the miners throwing stones before the police charge even though the stone throwing followed the police charge?

 

You are aware that she wasn't actually struck right?

 

If she had been the officer who is clearly visible and identifiable would have been prosecuted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She didn't get anything. She admitted herself that she was not hit by the policeman with the baton.

 

Because he missed because she was pulled out of the way.

 

---------- Post added 31-10-2016 at 15:45 ----------

 

You are aware that she wasn't actually struck right?

 

If she had been the officer who is clearly visible and identifiable would have been prosecuted.

 

Ahh that makes it ok then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have any evidence to the contrary?

 

Evidence of what? The Beeb swapping around footage? Thought that was common knowledge.

 

Do I have evidence it was deliberate? No.

 

But we know how the way the media reports things clouds judgement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.