Total Chaos Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I can't believe he is still getting done for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dosxuk Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I can't believe he is still getting done for it. You can't believe someone accused of being a child abductor / paedophile is being tried? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I can't believe he is still getting done for it. I know, someone was entrusted to look after a vulnerable child, and he ended up having sex with her, and then rather than face the consequences he abducted her to a foreign country. What are the Police thinking about prosecuting him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny5 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I can't believe he is still getting done for it. Doing a spot of fishing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 May means is allowed to be and the court is allowing it. The girl was identified when she was missing but the rules cover court cases and there is now a court case. Just because she has been identified in the past doesn't mean she should be allowed to be identified now. My point was that the court is not obliged, but can, order her name to be withheld. In this case they have ordered it, but IMO that's a pretty stupid order since her name is already widely known and has been reported at length. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Total Chaos Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I know, someone was entrusted to look after a vulnerable child, and he ended up having sex with her, and then rather than face the consequences he abducted her to a foreign country. What are the Police thinking about prosecuting him? It was all mutual,plus the girl knew exactly what she was doing,she was not vulnerable at all.If she had been 16 and not 15 their would be no story.The thread about it when it 1st happened, was a 50-50 mixed feelings about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 You can't believe someone accused of being a child abductor / paedophile is being tried? Anyone who has accused him of paedophilia must be confused as to the age of the girl involved, there is no suggestion that she is prepubescent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pottedplant Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 You can't believe someone accused of being a child abductor / paedophile is being tried? We had all this from him on the previous thread - helped along by Mr Smith and occasionally lil minx. Apparently its love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 It was all mutual,plus the girl knew exactly what she was doing.If she had been 16 and not 15 their would be no story.The thread about it when it 1st happened, was a 50-50 mixed feelings about it. There would as he was still in a position of authority. Had she been 16 and he not her teacher, then there'd be no case and no story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pottedplant Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 It was all mutual,plus the girl knew exactly what she was doing.If she had been 16 and not 15 their would be no story.The thread about it when it 1st happened, was a 50-50 mixed feelings about it. She was 14 when it started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now