rubydazzler Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Only 532, it doesnt look good...But when this thread first started, it was only 99. There's still time ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmitchell Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Signed........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steptoad Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Signed and passed on.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Isn't the proposed site for the housing separated from the hill fort by a couple of rows of houses? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alirosdan Posted July 1, 2012 Author Share Posted July 1, 2012 Isn't the proposed site for the housing separated from the hill fort by a couple of rows of houses? Yes Longcol it's very close. Too close....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubydazzler Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Isn't the proposed site for the housing separated from the hill fort by a couple of rows of houses?It's about 200m away. The existing housing around there should never have been allowed anyway. Would people feel so complacent if we suggested building housing a couple of hundred metres away from Carl Wark? And this is exactly the same thing. What sort of philistine is the planning officer who thinks that he should be allowed to overturn the official designation of that area? The tally is creeping up, nearly 700 now. Keep up the good work, and if you have time to email an objection or comment in, it can't do any harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackLakeland Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Anyway I wouldn't live in a house up there, its haunted by a hundred dead centurians... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alirosdan Posted July 1, 2012 Author Share Posted July 1, 2012 Anyway I wouldn't live in a house up there, its haunted by a hundred dead centurians... No Jack, many more than that. The hill is a devil to get up in the snow too. The houses just wouldn't sell Up to 682 signatures (and many more at the event on Wincobank Common yesterday) so one last push people please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubydazzler Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 (edited) No Jack, many more than that. The hill is a devil to get up in the snow too. The houses just wouldn't sell Up to 682 signatures (and many more at the event on Wincobank Common yesterday) so one last push people please. 695 now, I've been mailing and fbing half the day letting friends and colleagues know about this. I noticed there was a mail from English Heritage but could only read the covering letter, the attachment which contained the actual comment hadn't been scanned over. Do you know what EH said about this app? ETA: found the attacment now. EH worse than useless, as usual. Offered no opinion only that the application should be decided in line with national and local planning guidelines and with specialist guidance. So, SCC, that'll be a big fat NO! then? Or should be. Edited July 1, 2012 by rubydazzler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anarchon Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Signed . . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now