Mecky   10 #373 Posted June 4, 2010 Well then we would have to give up Britain. The Vikings and Scandinavians were here long before we were.  Not sure about that, there have been people on these isles thousands of years before the romans came. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Clearway   10 #374 Posted June 4, 2010 It doesn't affect you, why should you care...but its in your name (and ours) Our taxes bailed out banks which funded arms companies which produced arms which went to Israel and ended up killing unarmed innocent civilians.! Oh and who funded the Arabs during the Cold War, who is providing all the rockets that they (to use your words) end up "killing unarmed innocent civillians" with? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Harleyman   12 #375 Posted June 4, 2010 Well then we would have to give up Britain. The Vikings and Scandinavians were here long before we were.  The original British were the Celts who were there before the Romans, Vikings and Scandinavians. The Welsh and native people of Cornwall are the remnants of the Celtic inhabitants Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Clearway   10 #376 Posted June 4, 2010 So this was a statement in protest against the murder of vietnamese countrymen/women/children by imperialist predominantly white causican nations.  Wasn't Napoleon an causican? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hard2miss   10 #377 Posted June 4, 2010 Oh and who funded the Arabs during the Cold War, who is providing all the rockets that they (to use your words) end up "killing unarmed innocent civillians" with? Could it be the same people that have armed the Israelies with guided misciles ? Nuclear weaponary ? training of their special forces ect ect ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Kingmaker2   10 #378 Posted June 4, 2010 The archeology proves that the jews were there first  The native Indians were in North America before the European Caucasians, as were the native Indians in South America there before the Spanish or Portuguese. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
NoddyHolder   10 #379 Posted June 4, 2010 How thick can you get or is it just general ignorance? The land was promised to the Jews by God and Moses took his people there. The Romans took the land from the Jews and gave it to the Arabs. The land is Jewish recommended to them by God, you can't get a higher endorsement than that. Would you go against God's word? All depends what his mortgage rate is Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Clearway   10 #380 Posted June 4, 2010 Could it be the same people that have armed the Israelies with guided misciles ? Nuclear weaponary ? training of their special forces ect ect ?So you believe that the I:loopy:ron Curtain countries armed the Israelis? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hard2miss   10 #381 Posted June 4, 2010 I don't know, Im asking the question. Its a cert none of the places in the region got anywhere with armoury without outside interests after their monies.  Trouble is selling arms has consiquences that can make it un profitable in the long term, especially if you get dragged into the conflict to clear it up. Look at Iraq as a brilliant example. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
headup   10 #382 Posted June 4, 2010 The original British were the Celts who were there before the Romans, Vikings and Scandinavians. The Welsh and native people of Cornwall are the remnants of the Celtic inhabitants  Sorry to continue the derail but...  That's not true. The first people in Britain were nomadic hunter-gatherers that you can't really stick a tribal label on. The 'celts' you refer to are the people who lived in Britain during the Iron Age and even then, those people would not have identified themselves as Celts since the term really only came into use in the 17th century.  Back on track...  Owership of a land by previous populations is not a strong argument anyway. As people point out, many of the countries and peoples around today would have to give up 'their' land in order to allow the original people back. It's just not feasible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jason Bourne   11 #383 Posted June 4, 2010 How thick can you get or is it just general ignorance?  I don't know if you're trolling or not, so here goes  The land is Jewish recommended to them by God, you can't get a higher endorsement than that. Would you go against God's word?  The Jews certainly went against God's word. Read up the 'ol New Testament, and see what they got up to!  x Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
truthlogic   10 #384 Posted June 4, 2010 If so, then Britain and the USA are also rogue states, since we also have targetted, and killed, the military leaders of organisations like the Taleban which are dedicated to our destruction.   sir when was the last time in world history a taliban / afagani pustun attacked the UK? or the U.S.A ??!!  since when have the Taliban claimed they whant to destroy us? prior to us invading for the 3rd time? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
