Alextopman Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 11 minutes ago, cuttsie said: I am not bothered who sponsors the Owls as long as they are not gambling sites , Those company's ruin lives and when young people see those names on a club shirt they are influenced . Any club that uses these sites should be ashamed . What about casinos?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alextopman Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 13 minutes ago, cuttsie said: I am not bothered who sponsors the Owls as long as they are not gambling sites , Those company's ruin lives and when young people see those names on a club shirt they are influenced . Any club that uses these sites should be ashamed . Shocking isn't it?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaLazarou Posted February 14 Author Share Posted February 14 3 minutes ago, Alextopman said: What about casinos?. By literal definition, a casino is a gambling site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alextopman Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 1 minute ago, PapaLazarou said: By literal definition, a casino is a gambling site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alextopman Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 17 minutes ago, cuttsie said: I am not bothered who sponsors the Owls as long as they are not gambling sites , Those company's ruin lives and when young people see those names on a club shirt they are influenced . Any club that uses these sites should be ashamed . Shocking isn't it Jud?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassett one Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 so the new sponsor and the old sponsor are part of the same company ? who in turn are in trouble with the finance section of law and this richards fella is the perfect man to replace mr chansiri thats a good idea not if thats the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapaLazarou Posted February 14 Author Share Posted February 14 14 minutes ago, bassett one said: so the new sponsor and the old sponsor are part of the same company ? who in turn are in trouble with the finance section of law and this richards fella is the perfect man to replace mr chansiri thats a good idea not if thats the case. Richards used to run the new sponsor (Wandisco, now re-branded with a new name following fraud investigation. He departed during or immediately following that fraud investigation. He now runs Eyup, your previous sponsor, which may have also had financial issues, hence being replaced as sponsor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now