blackydog   40 #25 Posted August 23, 2022 On 26/07/2022 at 17:15, Jeffrey Shaw said: True. There is no right to charge any up-front advance fee. The only such right, prior to completion, arises if P serves Notice of Claim on V. V then has legal right to serve a statutory demand requiring a deposit of the greater of: a. £25; or b. three times the ground rent payable each year on P's own property (disregarding any others in the same lease). They may not have the right, but can make it difficult for me (or my solicitor) to progress unless I pay up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jeffrey Shaw   93 #26 Posted August 24, 2022 The only real way to disabuse them and stop the difficulty that they're causing is to take them off to the Tribunal/County Court. This then exposes you to further delays and possibly extra costs not recoverable from L- who knows this very well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
blackydog   40 #27 Posted August 25, 2022 (edited) 22 hours ago, Jeffrey Shaw said: The only real way to disabuse them and stop the difficulty that they're causing is to take them off to the Tribunal/County Court. This then exposes you to further delays and possibly extra costs not recoverable from L- who knows this very well. My driver for this is to avoid Coppen buying the freehold, and making my life more difficult than it need be. A solicitor I spoke to told me this was unlikely as Coppen aren't interested in buying long leases of hundreds of years. They prey on shorter leases where they can cause more financial havoc for people.  The same solicitor also told me these are probably the management companies legal charges. I have asked them to confirm if this will be the total of charges, or if they are likely to be more. Edited August 25, 2022 by blackydog Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jeffrey Shaw   93 #28 Posted September 4, 2022 On 25/08/2022 at 15:32, blackydog said: A solicitor I spoke to told me this was unlikely as Coppen aren't interested in buying long leases of hundreds of years. They prey on shorter leases where they can cause more financial havoc for people.   No- Coppen has regularly bought- and continues to buy- freehold reversion portfolios subject to long leases. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
blackydog   40 #29 Posted September 7, 2022 On 04/09/2022 at 15:41, Jeffrey Shaw said: No- Coppen has regularly bought- and continues to buy- freehold reversion portfolios subject to long leases. Spoken again to the agents today. After a bit of too-ing and fro-ing, it appears I am ok to take this up with the current freeholder myself and not have to pay the agent £360, to get things moving. Suspect someone has been a little economical with the truth along the way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jeffrey Shaw   93 #30 Posted September 7, 2022 4 hours ago, blackydog said: Spoken again to the agents today. After a bit of too-ing and fro-ing, it appears I am ok to take this up with the current freeholder myself and not have to pay the agent £360, to get things moving. Suspect someone has been a little economical with the truth along the way. There's no right for anyone to demand £360 in advance. The ONLY pre-completion demand (other than ground rent, under s.166 of course) is if the tenant (leaseholder) serves Notice of Claim. The landlord (reversioner) can then demand a statutory deposit, capped at the larger of: a. £25; and b. three times the property's own annual ground rent.  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...