donkey   10 #577 Posted August 27, 2014 (edited) you could argue that Israel is actually upholding 'international law' by continuing to administer the territories they gained in 1967 under UNSCR 242. It is amazing how people like the BBC's Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen keep on saying that the settlements are 'illegal', without bothering to inform the audience, just how they are illegal.  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/01/world/middleeast/un-panel-says-israeli-settlement-policy-violates-law.html  No doubt the UN and the people who drew up the Geneva Convention are all a bunch of antisemites too?  It is just a shame that there are so many people out there who need legal rulings to demonstrate to them that driving families and communities into refugee camps so you can take their land is just wrong Edited August 27, 2014 by donkey Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
blake   10 #578 Posted August 27, 2014 So they defeated Jordan, Syria and Egypt in wars more than 40 years ago and therefore they are entitled to drive Palestinians from their land in Palestine now?  perhaps you would care to explain why Arab Israelis privately own more land than Jewish Israelis do? Even though they are less than 25% of the population? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
donkey   10 #579 Posted August 27, 2014 How many Israelis live in houses and on land that was once owned by someone living in Gaza?  https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/UN/unrwa6.html  Almost all of them.  There are One million one hundred thousand Palestinian refugees in Gaza according to this UN report published on the website 'Jewish Virtual Library' (antisemites perhaps?). It seems likely the number of them who have been displaced from the West Bank would number in the hundreds of thousands.  ---------- Post added 27-08-2014 at 12:44 ----------  perhaps you would care to explain why Arab Israelis privately own more land than Jewish Israelis do? Even though they are less than 25% of the population?  The vast majority of West Bank Palestinians do not have Israeli citizenship, and therefore are not protected under Israeli law. A deliberate red herring.  ---------- Post added 27-08-2014 at 12:45 ----------  And whilst we're at it what do you think islamists are currently doing in just about every country throughout the world?  So your argument is two wrongs make a right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
blake   10 #580 Posted August 27, 2014 https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/UN/unrwa6.html   The vast majority of West Bank Palestinians do not have Israeli citizenship, and therefore are not protected under Israeli law. A deliberate red herring.   it is not a red herring at all. It is a simple statement of fact. Arab Israeli citizens privately own more land in Israel, than Jewish Israelis do - despite being a minority.  the West Bank is not part of Israel. Unlike the Golan Heights and Jerusalem, which Israel did annex after 1967. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
firemanbob   10 #581 Posted August 27, 2014 https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/UN/unrwa6.html Almost all of them.  Its very likley to be zero, the vast majority of Gazan's were born in Gaza, 99.5% are Palestinian Arab, many of their ancestors are Egyptian.  80% of the people living in the West Bank, about 2,100,000 are Palestinian Arabs, many of their ancestors are Jordanian.  There are more Palestinian Arabs living in Israel that Jews living in Gaza and the West Bank. Palestinian Arabs make up over 20% of Israels population and Jews make Up 0% of Gazas population. Over 3 times more Arabs live in the state of Israel than Israelis living in the West Bank and Gaza.  The Jewish exodus from Arab countries was larger than the Muslims exodus from Israel.  Israel was once part of the most powerful Islamic caliphate that ever existed and it grinds on Muslims that it is now a Jewish state and Hamas along with Isis and many other Islamist organization want it to be part of a new Islamic caliphate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #582 Posted August 27, 2014 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/01/world/middleeast/un-panel-says-israeli-settlement-policy-violates-law.html No doubt the UN and the people who drew up the Geneva Convention are all a bunch of antisemites too?  It is just a shame that there are so many people out there who need legal rulings to demonstrate to them that driving families and communities into refugee camps so you can take their land is just wrong  It is this that firemanbob, others of his ilk and of course the Israeli government, fail to recognise (or even acknowledge). There will never be peace until this simple truth is acknowledged.  ---------- Post added 27-08-2014 at 13:53 ----------  Its very likley to be zero, the vast majority of Gazan's were born in Gaza, 99.5% are Palestinian Arab, many of their ancestors are Egyptian.  80% of the people living in the West Bank, about 2,100,000 are Palestinian Arabs, many of their ancestors are Jordanian.  There are more Palestinian Arabs living in Israel that Jews living in Gaza and the West Bank. Palestinian Arabs make up over 20% of Israels population and Jews make Up 0% of Gazas population. Over 3 times more Arabs live in the state of Israel than Israelis living in the West Bank and Gaza.  The Jewish exodus from Arab countries was larger than the Muslims exodus from Israel.  Israel was once part of the most powerful Islamic caliphate that ever existed and it grinds on Muslims that it is now a Jewish state and Hamas along with Isis and many other Islamist organization want it to be part of a new Islamic caliphate.  Firemanbob, do you accept the premise that driving families and communities into refugee camps so you can take their land is just wrong? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
firemanbob   10 #583 Posted August 27, 2014 (edited) Firemanbob, do you accept the premise that driving families and communities into refugee camps so you can take their land is just wrong?  A refugee is a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster, the people of Gaza didn't have country to be forced out of, the overwhelming majority were born in Gaza, they describe themselves as Palestinian Arabs and still live in the region that is historically called Palestine, they could move to Syria and Jordon and still be living in Palestine. Would you describe Israelis as refugees because many are the descendants of people forced off their lands with over a million forced out of Muslim Arab countries.  ---------- Post added 27-08-2014 at 14:11 ----------  It is this that firemanbob, others of his ilk and of course the Israeli government, fail to recognise (or even acknowledge). There will never be peace until this simple truth is acknowledged.  Do you think it is a good reason to fire rockets at civilians living in Israel, 20% of whom describe themselves as Palestinian Arabs? Edited August 27, 2014 by firemanbob Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #584 Posted August 27, 2014 A refugee is a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster, the people of Gaza didn't have country to be forced out of, the overwhelming majority were born in Gaza, they describe themselves as Palestinian Arabs and still live in the region that is historically called Palestine, they could move to Syria and Jordon and still be living in Palestine. Would you describe Israelis as refugees because many are the descendants of people forced off their lands with over a million forced out of Muslim Arab countries.  A truly cowardly and pathetic attempt to avoid answering the question. Have you no moral integrity whatsoever? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
firemanbob   10 #585 Posted August 27, 2014 (edited) A truly cowardly and pathetic attempt to avoid answering the question. Have you no moral integrity whatsoever?  The interesting thing is that you never (amended to rarely.) answer questions so you must fall within your own above description. Edited August 27, 2014 by firemanbob Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #586 Posted August 27, 2014 The interesting thing is that you never answer questions so you must fall within your own above description.  That simply isn't true bob. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
firemanbob   10 #587 Posted August 27, 2014 That simply isn't true bob. I will amend it to rarely then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #588 Posted August 27, 2014 I will amend it to rarely then.  I'll just nip off to vomit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...