Mr Westwood

http://sheffield.gumtree.com/ That site may help too.

You might be better going to the wanted section and starting a thread there. What sort of things are you after and where are you located? I have a telly going for nowt but it's only an old CRT square one.

Never provides anything to counteract it either. They just pop up and label yo a liar or a troll. They really are worse than the things they claim to despise. Drneil did the same. He hasn't been back to explain himself yet.

When was the spotlight on atheists or me for that matter? I'm not the one that has spent 9 pages on here making crap up to justify my beliefs. You believe in a fraud Grahame and you excuse it everything even when you're up against the wall. But it's fine you can blame the atheists all you want, it just makes you and what you claim to speak for seem all the more ridiculous.

Having nothing else to believe in. An atheist would surely blame themselves, don't you think?

Still looking for others to blame Grahame? I understand why at this time you are feeling threatened. If I believed, I would pray for you.

Perhaps the Irish government thought the Catholic church could be trusted with god's children.

Religion makes its own reputation. Whether you find it callous or not, horrific things are done by people who claim to be holier than the rest of us because of who they believe in. You sound like a child. Religion can be and should be challenged at every turn, whether you find it callous and unpleasant or not.

Would paedophilia be alright if the paedophile married the child Grahame? Would god endorse such a wedding? I believe he did with Mohammed, I know, it's christianity 2.0 but if it was fine for old Mo then surely it's fine for any other that believes in the big G.

Will you answer my questions please regarding god's stance on marrying children. You seem to imply that if they marry the child that isn't paedophilia. Care to explain that one too. I know you have a lot of questions from a lot of people but it would be nice to have an explanation.

Grahame, single handedly destroying christianity since 2005. That should be your new sig Grahame.

There would be seeing as Paedophilia is So the bible, your god, your religion does support under-age marriage and if married under-age sex then?

The thing I find the most shocking about this thread is that people still watch ITN.

As a christian he's unlikely to believe in evolution and more likely to swing towards intelligent design. According to his beliefs the Earth is only a few thousand years old and the bible was the way god dictated said rules. I don't think christians consider anything before Adam and Eve. Though it does make you wonder who created everything pre 2000 odd years ago. Perhaps god didn't care then. I would like to ask Grahame one question relating to this post: Would paedophilia be alright if the paedophile married the child Grahame? Would god endorse such a wedding? I believe he did with Mohammed, I know, it's christianity 2.0 but if it was fine for old Mo then surely it's fine for any other that believes in the big G.

Again, this one. Are you saying that 7/7 was alright because Iraq was an illegal war? It seems like you are. Furthermore, were the 7/7 bombers from Iraq?

The one where you said 7/7 was alright because the war in Iraq was illegal. The nationality of the 7/7 bombers. Those two for a start. I really think you should be checking what you have written. You did suggest the 7/7 bombers were from Iraq or Afghanistan and that what they did was alright. I just wonder why.

I used the word and look how you don't like it. You ought to go steady the next time the likes of you and Flamingjimmy insinuate others are it. I believe that's where it started.

If that's what you call asking a few questions? Still not gong to answer them then?

You would do if you had the balls though. Again. Come on, stop insinuating and do. Least when I insult you I give you a reason why. You haven't got the nuts to isay what you're thinking and haven't backed up one of your ridiculous statements yet. I asked you and Flamingjimmy questions, you have both bottled it.

Not answering any of my questions then?

It does seem that way yes. Seemingly there can't be any grey areas with this one. If you air any opinion other than "It's what they're entitled to" you're a racist and all the others will point their holier than thou fingers.

Don't blame Bangingman. You're backtracking now. So you decided to lower yourself to the level of those you claim to despise? We're the 7/7 bombers Iraqi or Afghani? So a muslim is O.K. to feel negative about people bombing "his" country but anyone else, likely to be white though, is labelled as a racist? Why is this?

I'm not on your side either. Just making a point.

Then explain your statement. You're worse than the so called racists you two. One justifies murder because some politicians started an illegal war and the other still can't explain why he didn't like the statement he attempted to insult me for but sadly, didn't have the balls to label me racist for, even though that was what he wanted to do. I have all night.

Then why the statement? Explain yourself more.