rodnreeluk
-
Posts
314 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Events
Articles
Posts posted by rodnreeluk
-
-
I'm going to Maltby-le-Marsh soon, near Oham Lakes. Years ago these used to be a well known (big) carp fishery. I've tried researching them on the 'net but can't find a home page. What information there is, largely dries up after 2013. The few reviews since then are flimsy (such as: great fishing) and don't give details of species, sizes, etc. Anyone have any up-to-date info please?
-
The only one with 30 lb+ that springs to mind reasonably local is Cromwell Lake:
-
So have I, so my comment stands. The difference is I didn't feel the need to try to impress people with my credentials. This is a public forum open for anyone to give their views/opinions without automatically being shouted down and abused by trolls and self-appointed experts like yourself. I suspect you must be retired as, due to the amount of time you spend on the forum, you can't have much time left for work.I have worked on EU funded projects, so... unfortunately you found the wrong topic to call me a troll. -
Unlike you, I only post on subjects I know something about. I don't troll and comment on just about every post on the forum. To-date you have made 10,521 posts - you must think you are the font of all knowledge.Ah, an expert. I assume you worked on many EU funded research-projects in the past? It isn't just the money that comes with it, it is the infrastructure and the ability to research something cross border, with other European researchers.
:suspect:
-
He could be checking you are human!In my pyjamas and slippers?:hihi:
-
I agree. Scotland gets £1600 p.a. per head more than England from the government. We are subsidising them.Scotland is only of benefit while the relationship is stable. Each time that Scotland looks to vote on the issue then that destabilises the union. IMO it would be reasonable for the rest of the UK to say "We are sick of you vacillating on this as it harms everyone else. Stay if you wish, but we will reduce the flow of money going to Scotland to be fair to everyone else in the union. We should not be subsidising you as we have done in the past. Accept that, or go."I would suggest that, if Scotland does have another referendum, in the interests of fairness, it should be run in tandem with an English referendum: "Do you want Scotland to remain part of the UK".
---------- Post added 28-06-2016 at 20:30 ----------
Why keep spreading these myths. The University of Sheffield did not get money from the E.U. The E.U. only acted as a middleman and gave the U of S some of the money paid in by the UK (less its "admin fee", of course).Nope. That is the North West.Can I point out that the University of Sheffield has received hundreds of millions from the EU for groundbreaking research and innovation. One of the big receivers was the Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre, this creates jobs like crazy for the local economy through its spin-offs, I know several people who have started a business and created jobs via the AMRC.
Will be sad when the funding for it, or future expansion disappears, but hey, we voted now.
-
Why would we want a "Norway" deal? We want our own, UK deal. Norway forged their own deal, not modelled on someone elses. Why shouldn't we?How am I in denial? If we get a Norway deal I will be delighted. It's the best I can hope for since Brexit. But if we get a Norway deal it will be seen as a huge failing for the Brexit voters. -
A classic case of self-denial. I am VERY HAPPY I voted the right way (to leave). You must realise how arrogant your statement is - that over half the people who voted are wrong, but little you, is right.No-one is spitting dummies out on the Remain side. But you Brexiters seem to be panicking that we are right. Are you starting to get worried you voted the wrong way then?I am also very happy at all the problems the Labour and Conservative parties are now suffering. It may shake them up enough so that they now come out of their elitist London-orientated bubble and start focusing on the real world.
For anyone interested in EU Trade deals with other parts of the world (not involving free movement of labour):
http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/agreements/#_other-countries
EU-Ecuador text of the trade agreement published, not yet ratified, 17 February 2015
Colombia and Peru - Trade Agreement, signed 26 July 2012
Central America - Association Agreement with a strong trade component, signed 29 June 2012
EU-Iraq - Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, signed on 11 May 2012
Papua New Guinea and Fiji - Interim Partnership Agreement ratified by Papua New Guinea in May 2011
Korea - New Generation Free Trade Agreement, signed 06 October 2010
Cameroon – Economic Partnership Agreement signed in 2009
Madagascar, Mauritius, the Seychelles, and Zimbabwe Economic Partnership Agreement signed in August 2009
Chile - Association Agreement and Additional Protocol, 01 February 2003 (trade) / 01 March 2005 (full agreement)
Mexico - Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement, 01 July 2000
South Africa - Trade, Development and Co-operation Agreement, 01 January 2000
CARIFORUM States - Economic Partnership Agreement, Provisionally applied
-
Why do people keep saying this? No-one yet knows what our agreement with the EU will be. I'm sick of these prophets. Countries in other parts of the world have, or are negotiating, trade deals with the EU that don't involve free movement of labour. Will the "remainers" please stop spitting your dummies out, respect the referendum result, get on with your lives and let the negotiations take place before criticising the outcome.I think Gove and Boris need to have a chat and make sure they are on the same page of the "How to Brexit" handbook. Boris still thinks we're having access to the single market, which of course requires free movement of labour, -
If your insurance is fully comp can't you claim through your insurer? They should then claim from the fishery owner. A better idea might be to threaten the fishery owner with doing that. If he pays you out directly it will save him the hassle and you, your no-claims.
-
Yes, all of them! Have you?Have you actually read any posts on this thread ?
The point I was making was that the police gave my neighbour the impression they had no intention of taking action.Read the above post and give it a little thought...... -
No, but they formulate and agree them, then pass them to the EU parliament for rubber stamping. Cite David Cameron's negotiations to reform the EU. Agreement was reached without any consultation with MEPs. They are expected to simply pass the deal.They don't pass any laws -
A meaningless vote so far as the UK is concerned, as we are such a minority in the EU and mostly out-voted.4% of laws last year and we had a vote on all of them.
-
The EU commissioners.Can you explain who these 'unelected bureaucrats' are -
No more ludicrous than living in a democracy and being told what to do by unelected bureaucrats you can't vote out.I'm sick of the leave side trying to stifle our success. On the one hand you say you want a prosperous economy while on the other you say we will raise the drawbridge.It's a ludicrous standpoint.
-
I'm current working on making my 3rd £million (gave the 1st 2 attempts up as bad jobs)
-
Why? As said earlier: The UK just has to agree to allow the Germans, French, Italians, etc sell their goods in the UK. The same as the EU needs to agree to allow the UK to sell its goods in Europe. Simple trade deal! No need to be any more complicated than that. (Tit for Tat)This definitely looks like a great recipe for negotiations and trading transitions that will span multiple parliaments. -
Many years ago, one of my neighbours reported drug dealing taking place every night in a car park across the road. The police told her they knew about it and would sooner have it happening there, where they knew, than somewhere else that they didn't know about.
What is the point of that? I thought the police were supposed to enforce the law! Nowadays it is like the police make the law by choosing which to enforce and which to ignore.
-
What makes you think the immigrant NHS workers would leave? Surely they came to the UK for a better life. There is no reason for their lifestyle to change if "Out" wins so why would they choose to leave?25% of the NHS workforce are immigrants. So if vote leavers are voting on this basis, they're destroying the NHS that the leave camp have promised another £100 million per week funding. -
Yes, they have to agree to allow the Germans, French, Italians, etc sell their goods in the UK. The same as the EU needs to agree to allow the UK to sell its goods in Europe. Simple trade deal!In practice they have to agree to something if they want some kind of access to the single market though? -
Fully agree.Will you be doing the same regarding cyclists?
-
I think Smeatons near Newark would just about fit into your one hour limit.
-
A great answer and one I agree with. I'd also like to add too many MP's have no convictions and/or integrity and say what they believe will make them appear on your side, whether they mean it or not. Being an MP is a good, well-paid career and maintaining and progressing in that career seems to be their main objective - not the good of the country and its citizens.I don't think that £75k plus generous expense qualifies as "little financial gain". I also despair of the greasy pole climbers who won't give a straight answer to simple questions.The good MPs are well worth their pay. There are a good many, though, who are not.
-
Could it just maybe be because most terrorists are muslim and the muslim group, ISIS (or whatever we are calling them today), choose to act like a set of savages?i havnt seen those people going against afros/chinese etc etc. it is always muslim
:suspect:
:hihi:
Oham Lakes Carp Fishing
in Sheffield Fishing Group
Posted