cloud 10 #13 Posted November 19, 2004 Originally posted by ianmitchell Just shows what pricks chavs are. Sorry buddy if you were caught for speeding, just slow down for the cameras! Is that the advice from your driving instructor then...? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Wavey 10 #14 Posted November 19, 2004 Just spoke to him.. it's proper intrusive surgery apparently. They have to access the back of his eye. He's in theatre now for an hour or so. They've told him htere's a good chance it'll be successful though so thats small comfort I suppose. At the end of the day rules are rules and i broke them. I just get so hacked off at the injustice of it all. Worst thing of all is seeing my mate. He's adiamond geezer and this has taken all the fun out of him. He's so gutted you wouldn't believe. he could rip any of those low life scum's head off one to one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Yodameister 10 #15 Posted November 19, 2004 I can't see the connection between the two issues. Are you suggesting that because there are some offences that the police struggle to deal with that you should be able to break speed limits with impunity? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
nick2 10 #16 Posted November 19, 2004 I don't understand why you all think the speed cameras are a waste of police time, it's just a machine connected to a computer, there are no police involved. If it the speed cameras didn't exist there would be hundreds of police driving (or sat at the side of the road all day) about trying to spot people speeding, not a good use of their time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Yodameister 10 #17 Posted November 19, 2004 I think it is very funny that in the popular opinion anyone commiting any crime should be punished more and more severely, but when it happens to be a crime that an individual commits, funnily enough severe punishments are not so popular. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Wavey 10 #18 Posted November 19, 2004 I don't think I said that did I? I've admitted I broke the rules and paid accordingly. I also said I'm miffed (to say the least) this morning because I reckon the police are more efficient at tax collecting than stopping crimes. There isn't a connection really. Sorry I upset you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Yodameister 10 #19 Posted November 19, 2004 I'm not at all upset. But if they are not connected why are they in the same post, under a new topic that you started? I obviously jumped to the wrong (but rather obvious) conclusion that you were linking the events. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Wavey 10 #20 Posted November 19, 2004 I'll consult you next time then eh? So should I be pleased to pay out £60 then? I'll leave it there. Got it off my chest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Yodameister 10 #21 Posted November 19, 2004 Well maybe you will think a bit more about the speed limit next time? Hmmm, maybe thats what the point of punishing criminal offences is? Do you ask a murderer if they are pleased about getting a 15 year prison sentence? not really a valid question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Wavey 10 #22 Posted November 19, 2004 What are you on about? I committed a crime and paid the price.. I said that. All I want is for a policeman to get to a scene of a crime quicker than forty five minutes. Theres a connection. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Phanerothyme 12 #23 Posted November 19, 2004 Perhaps "Scrote Cameras" are required. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Wavey 10 #24 Posted November 19, 2004 The scrote being me by the sounds of it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...