sufc_tom Posted June 18, 2007 Posted June 18, 2007 I think that whenever a new thread concerning football is put up there should be a limited ammount of replys from each forum member. At the minute as soon as a new football thread is introduced you get a few answers and then plekhanov and LFCMadPaul decide to have a slanging match which spoils the thread. Why they both can't confine their nursery antics to the pub or whatever and try and act more grown up on here. Fire away you pair,I've got a thick skin. Thank you scottishdude! Nobody can have a personal opinion without Plekhenov dismissing it to spoilt child effect. It would be nice if people could agree to disagree in a gentlemanly manner with resorting to personal insults and degrading comments.
plekhanov Posted June 18, 2007 Posted June 18, 2007 I think that whenever a new thread concerning football is put up there should be a limited ammount of replys from each forum member. At the minute as soon as a new football thread is introduced you get a few answers and then plekhanov and LFCMadPaul decide to have a slanging match which spoils the thread. Why they both can't confine their nursery antics to the pub or whatever and try and act more grown up on here. Fire away you pair,I've got a thick skin. What was that you were saying about ''nursery antics' and acting 'grown up''?
plekhanov Posted June 18, 2007 Posted June 18, 2007 Can you not just simply disagree with someones opinion without patronising them? In what way was the post of mine you objected to patronising?
plekhanov Posted June 18, 2007 Posted June 18, 2007 Thank you scottishdude! Nobody can have a personal opinion without Plekhenov dismissing it to spoilt child effect. It would be nice if people could agree to disagree in a gentlemanly manner with resorting to personal insults and degrading comments. pot kettle black, my posts in this thread have all been on topic and unlike you, i don't make a habit of making post which are nothing but personal attacks on people.
Guderian Posted June 18, 2007 Posted June 18, 2007 I think Plekhanov V LFC Mad Paul is a great spectator sport...........
sufc_tom Posted June 18, 2007 Posted June 18, 2007 pot kettle black, my posts in this thread have all been on topic and unlike you, i don't make a habit of making post which are nothing but personal attacks on people. I wont deny that, which is fortunate because I can't. I apologise for any offence caused to Guderian and I am defenceless. What I would like to see though is people feel free to pop up their opinions without wondering what response it would bring. You idiot
LFCMadPaul Posted June 19, 2007 Posted June 19, 2007 So the opinions of professional footballers are of no relevance to a discussion on professional footballers . Yes, very much so: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/internationals/6715321.stm http://tribalfootball.com/article.php?id=43503 http://tribalfootball.com/article.php?id=41477 http://tribalfootball.com/article.php?id=40108 http://tribalfootball.com/article.php?id=39721 Some very good, expert opinions there! It's funny but, they all seem to think that Gerrard is an 'all round' player aswell who can pass brilliantly, tackle, defend, attack, score goals etc etc. He might be more versatile than Scholes but Gerrards's passing and vision aren't even close as such he would be significantly inferior in Schole's role.. Don't talk rubish! Gerrards passing is top draw as is his vision. Gerrard is in no way inferior to Scholes and if you really think that then you really are very very diluded! Gerrard likes to bomb around the pitch in as free an attacking role as possible whilst others take responsibility for more defensive duties Are you saying Gerrard doesn't take responsabilty for defensive duties yet Scholes does?? Surely not! Scholes is a great player but as a defensive midfielder he is average at best. He is the worlds worst tackler! In your opinion (going on what you have said) Scholes is better than Gerrard at passing, defending, has better vision and can control a game better, whereas Gerrard is only more versatile! Iv'e never heard so much tripe.
LFCMadPaul Posted June 19, 2007 Posted June 19, 2007 Or that he's amongst the worlds best at it, which he obviously isn't. It's just bizarre that you're so insistent that Gerrard is the world best attacking midfielder considering how rarely your own manager (whom you also seem to idolise) plays him in that position. It's not just me Plekh, many many players and managers think Gerrard is amongst the worlds best, as i've shown. You don't and that's fine but your opinion compared to the people i've quoted means nothing. As for Benitez, i don't idolise him but i do think he is doing a good job and has a record that is not even debatable. Real Madrid think he is a great manager also, hence why they have tried to poach him on several occasions.
LFCMadPaul Posted June 19, 2007 Posted June 19, 2007 I think that whenever a new thread concerning football is put up there should be a limited ammount of replys from each forum member. At the minute as soon as a new football thread is introduced you get a few answers and then plekhanov and LFCMadPaul decide to have a slanging match which spoils the thread. Why they both can't confine their nursery antics to the pub or whatever and try and act more grown up on here. Fire away you pair,I've got a thick skin. My opologies! I have to admit it does often turn out like that it's just sometimes he is so infuriating. Oh well i'll leave it there. If Plekh wants to be so bias as to claim that 6 of Man Utd's players make up the 11 best players in the world today and that Steven Gerrard is no more than a versatile player who neglects his defensive responsabilities, then who am i to argue
Preacher Man Posted June 19, 2007 Posted June 19, 2007 I think Plekhanov V LFC Mad Paul is a great spectator sport........... its more of a sport than cheerleading
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.