daftlad Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 The Chief Constable has pleaded guilty by letter as a member of the forcr incurred a speeding ticket. The fine will come out the money we all contribute to the police no doubt, not out of his own pocket. They were unable to find the driver responsible too, gives me real confidence in the police that does. Cannot find a person who was driving one of their own cars. This avoids a copper with 3 points on his licence. I wonder if the police put as much effort into this as they do to us ordinary motorist who go over the limit by 5 mph. I don't think so somehow. When it comes to being caught speeding its one rule for the police and another for joe public Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 I think that you'll find that the you'd have exactly the same opportunities to avoid a fine if you went to court for a speeding ticket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 This is old news and you will find a thread on it somewhere on here. "Med" is a bit livid with the closing of ranks that failed to identify the offender and he appeared to have tried his best to make them take the rap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daftlad Posted December 29, 2006 Author Share Posted December 29, 2006 This is old news and you will find a thread on it somewhere on here. "Med" is a bit livid with the closing of ranks that failed to identify the offender and he appeared to have tried his best to make them take the rap. You don't seriously believe that do you, coppers close ranks and protect themselves when the **** hits the fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgksheff Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Right or wrong. Whether I agree or not. I believe that 'Med' tried to get them identified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daftlad Posted December 29, 2006 Author Share Posted December 29, 2006 Right or wrong. Whether I agree or not. I believe that 'Med' tried to get them identified. Cant have tried very hard, it doesn't give me much confidence in the plods if they cannot find the person responsible, I would think they have to sign on duty and for the car they use for the day, so if they cannot find the plod responsible its a poor show Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heyesey Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 You don't seriously believe that do you, coppers close ranks and protect themselves when the **** hits the fan. Which is exactly what the Chief Constable is livid ABOUT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB27 Posted December 30, 2006 Share Posted December 30, 2006 Must admit I find it hard to believe that they couldn't identify who was driving the car at the time. Certainly sounds like a bit of a cover up job, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_DADDY (2) Posted December 30, 2006 Share Posted December 30, 2006 A cover up KB? What a rediculous thing to say, you should be ashamed of yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heyesey Posted December 30, 2006 Share Posted December 30, 2006 Must admit I find it hard to believe that they couldn't identify who was driving the car at the time. Certainly sounds like a bit of a cover up job, no? Sounds like? Everybody knows perfectly well it's a cover-up, including Hughes himself. That's what he's mad at; but since nobody will talk, he either fires an entire county's supply of police officers, or just sucks it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.